the bird on fire

The Palm Valley School Student Blog

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Powered by Genesis

The Most Successful Unemployed Political Commentator in The History of Television News

May 18, 2023 by szachik@pvs.org Leave a Comment

If you’ve been asking, “Where’s Tucker Carlson?” Luke has something to say about that.

By Junior Luke Sonderman

Photo Source: The Advocate

“Tucker Swanson McNear Carlson is  an American television host, conservative political commentator and author who has hosted the nightly political talk show Tucker Carlson Tonight on Fox News since 2016” (imdb.com). On Monday, April 24th, Rupert Murdoch, owner of Fox News, fired Tucker Carlson from Fox News only one week after the Dominion Voting System settlement which made Fox News responsible for over $700 million in damages (latimes.com). So who is Tucker Carlson? Why did he get fired? And, why is he in the news headlines?

Tucker Carlson Tonight averaged over 3.25 million views per night in 2023 (thehill.com). That is over double CNN’s total nightly viewership (forbes.com). According to Britannica, “Carlson was known for his extreme positions on a range of political and social issues” (britannica.com). Time Magazine refers to Tucker Carlson’s style of journalism as “Tuckerism,” saying that he “sanitizes and legitimizes right-wing conspiratorial thinking, dodges when you try to nail him down on the specifics, then wraps it all in an argument about censorship and free speech” (time.com). His massive fanbase is full of millions of Americans “who are already suspicious of everything he questions” (time.com). Carlson gained traction amongst the far right by televising theories that challenged mainstream media reports on subjects as varied as immigration, George Floyd, and masks (time.com). After Carlson and Fox parted ways on April 21st, Fox’s market value dropped by a whopping 800 million dollars (cbsnews.com). 

Although Carlson’s removal coincidentally came a week after the 700-million-dollar Dominion lawsuit, The Guardian attributes his removal from the company to “a lawsuit filed by his former senior booking producer Abby Grossberg, who claimed she faced sexism and a hostile work environment” (theguardian.com). 

Personally, I attribute his removal to a more long-term plan for credibility on Fox’s part. There is no doubt that Carlson’s removal has hurt the finances of Fox, but removing extreme far-right commentators on Fox News will only help their long-term credibility, especially once conspiracy-theory breeders fall out of the limelight. I think Fox wants to leave the conspiracy theories to sources like Newsmax and Info Wars. It suits them better. 

Filed Under: Controversy, Culture Tagged With: Luke Sonderman, The Most Successful Unemployed Political Commentator In The History of Television News

We Need to Abolish the Electoral College

September 7, 2022 by szachik@pvs.org 1 Comment

We’re concluding our look at causes. Indiana, who feels strongly about many things, expresses passion for the Electoral College–not for keeping it, but for abolishing it.

Blog Advisor Zachik

By Indy Behr, Junior

What is the Electoral College?

In the United States, Presidential elections are not actually decided by the people directly. They are decided by a compromise made between the Founding Fathers in the Constitution called the electoral college. A candidate wins the election by winning at least 270 of the 538 possible electoral votes. Voters decide how a group of electors vote, and these electoral votes are then certified every four years on a day you may recall, January 6, and the events that transpired on this day in 2021 have led to the Electoral Count Reform Act being introduced in Congress, which would make several changes to the electoral college certification process such as establishing the Vice President’s role in certifying the vote as ceremonial and raising the objection threshold to 20% of both the House and Senate, as opposed to the current system where only one member of each body is required to object.

The electoral college is an antidemocratic institution that allows a minority of voters to determine the future of our country, and it no longer has any use. I believe that America cannot truly be referred to as a democracy until the electoral college is abolished, and until then, serious reform is required.

Supporters of former President Donald Trump storm the US Capitol as a Joint Session of Congress is counting the electoral votes of the 2020 Presidential election. 

Disproportionate Representation

If anyone should be upset about the electoral college, it should be us  Californians. Wyoming, the least populated state in the US, has 581,000 citizens, according to the US Census Bureau. Due to its size, Wyoming has only one Representative in the House of Representatives and, like all states, two Senators. The amount of electoral votes a state receives is simply the amount of people in their Congressional delegation. This means that in Wyoming, one electoral vote represents 135,000 citizens. California has a population of 39,538,000, and has 55 electoral votes (this will change to 54 in the 2024 Presidential election). Therefore, one electoral vote represents 712,000 people. However, one electoral vote represents just 195,000 people in Wyoming. Yes, you heard that right, a voter in Wyoming has more than three times the voting power as someone in California. Some Republicans argue that Democratic voters concentrated in big cities choosing who wins in the end is unfair, but guess what? That is where the actual people live!

washingtonpost.com

Forgotten States

Another issue with the electoral college means that during a Presidential election most states are not visited by candidates, and most states don’t even see candidates’ TV ads as there is no point. This is because some states are so partisan that it is near impossible for a candidate to win. The fact that candidates feel that trying to promote their candidacies to voters is a waste of time is incredibly problematic in my opinion, and unfortunately the candidates are indeed making a strategic decision in this case. The electoral college is for the most part a winner-takes-all system, meaning that regardless of how narrow or wide a statewide win is, all electoral votes go to the winner, with the exception of Maine and Nebraska. In 2020, six million Californians voted for Donald Trump, and two million Ohioans voted for Joe Biden. Despite this making up almost 10% of the total popular vote, these people never had their voice heard. Donald Trump never made a single visit to California because he knew that it was simply impossible to outright win the state, meaning winning swing votes would not benefit him. In this model presented by the New York Times, we can see that TV-ad buys in the 2020 Presidential election were concentrated in just a few states. California did not have a single ad! Trump and Republicans spent many millions on ads in Florida and won in the end, and yet he won one million more votes in California than in Florida. In spite of this, California’s winner-takes-all system gave all electoral votes to Biden, and Florida gave all electoral votes to Trump. 

nytimes.com

Faithless Electors

Though luckily in 2020 we did not see any, in 2016 we saw a massive uptick in what are known as faithless electors, likely due to both major party candidates being relatively unpopular. Many people do not realize this, but electors are actual individuals assigned to vote for one party in the event they win. These electors are selected by the state party of the winning candidate. However, in almost half of the states, electors are able to vote for another candidate regardless of the will of the voters. Trump was expected to win 306 electors, yet only won 304. Clinton won 227 instead of 232. Seven of the 538 total electors voted faithlessly. Do you know who Faith Spotted Eagle is? I didn’t, yet she won an electoral vote in 2016. The late Colin Powell, George W. Bush’s Secretary of State, won three electoral votes. Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) won two electoral Vice Presidential votes, one being with Powell, one from Senator Bernie Sanders (I-VT).

In 2016, Hilary Clinton won the state of Washington over 500,000 votes, or 15.7%, yet a whopping 33% of the electors voted for candidates who did not appear on the ballot. Though some of these candidates received a small amount of write-in votes, Powell won three votes, or 25% of the total electors, with a grand total of zero votes. In 2004, John Edwards was Democrat John Kerry’s running mate, and yet in Minnesota he received both the Presidential and Vice Presidential nod from one elector. And, because these slates of electors are selected by the victor’s party, these electors are often relatives of politicians or retired lobbyists. Both former President Bill Clinton (D) and his wife Hillary Clinton (D) were Biden electors in New York, as were the New York City Comptroller and the Temporary President of NY’s State Senate. A Florida State Senator, Keith Perry (R), was a Trump elector in Florida. The only disqualifying factors for electors are being an incumbent US Senator or Representative, and since the Civil War, having engaged in rebellion or insurrection against the country. 

Faithless Colorado elector Michael Baca casts his ballot in 2016. He chose to support a former Ohio Governor, Republican John Kasich, rather than Hillary Clinton.

Popular Vote Winners Losing

In 1824, 1876, 1888, 2000, and 2016, the individual who won a plurality, or in 1876, an outright majority of the popular vote, lost the election. The electoral college gives so much more power to residents of smaller states that in 2016, despite winning the popular vote by 2.8 million or 2% in 2016, Hillary Clinton lost by 77 electors. In 2000, Democrat Al Gore defeated Republican George W. Bush by over 500,000 in the popular vote yet lost by five electoral votes in the end, or four if you do not recognize a faithless elector who did not vote at all. In the end, the conservative-dominated Supreme Court forced Florida to end an ongoing recount, and according to CNN, “The studies also show that Gore likely would have won a statewide recount of all undervotes and overvotes, which are ballots that included multiple votes for president and were thus not counted at all . . . . The studies also support the belief that more voters went to the polls in Florida on Election Day intending to vote for Gore than for Bush.”

Florida vote counters try to determine which candidate was selected on a ballot in 2000. 

Conclusion

To me, it is very clear we need to abolish the electoral college. However, this would require a Constitutional amendment which has an approximately 0% chance of passing within my lifetime. It would require 67% of both the House and Senate to pass, which itself is completely impossible considering the Senate also has the issue of disproportionately representing smaller states, and it then would require 38 states to ratify it through their legislatures, even more unlikely. So, in the meantime, we are going to have to continue dealing with the electoral college. However, we can support reform so that we can scrap the winner-takes-all system like Nebraska and Maine have done, and we can also support banning faithless electors. But, if you really want your voice heard, your only option is to move to a swing state like Wisconsin.

Though support among Republicans has dropped, most people still support abolishing the electoral college as of 2018.

Filed Under: Controversy, History, Laws, Politics Tagged With: Indy Behr, We Need to Abolish the Electoral College

Cats vs. Dogs

April 27, 2022 by szachik@pvs.org Leave a Comment

An Op-Ed By Alyna Rei

A common question I hear a lot is “Do you prefer cats or dogs?” Both animals bring comfort to many people. It really does depend on the person if they prefer a cat or a dog. If you are into a calm, quiet, lazy animal, go with a cat (not saying all dogs aren’t calm). If you are into a more energetic, active, and happy animal, go with a dog. Cats will be in their own world and will come to you when they want to while a dog sticks by your side.

If I were to choose, I would choose dogs. For example, we have cat allergies in my house. So getting a cat would be torture. Another reason I choose dogs is because dogs help me stay responsible and active. Cats to me are more of an indoor pet, while a dog needs exercise. I have never seen someone “walk” their cat. 

I also just learned that cats can not be service animals. The only animal that can be a service animal is a dog. 

Below are my two golden retrievers, Lucy and Ethel. I’ve had them since I was in sixth grade. Both have taught me and my brother great responsibility: we feed them, clean the yard, and take them for walks.


Here are people’s opinions on this common question: Do you prefer dogs or cats?

“Dogs.  Cats are bendy and weird.”

Sienna Price (8th grade)

“Both. I don’t want to be biased.”

Abigail Horwitt (10th grade)

“Both. I’ve always had cats, but dogs have been a revelation in my life.”

Ms. Zachik (teacher)

“Dogs. I’m allergic to cats. Dogs have more personality.”

Lilah Nick (sophomore)

“I prefer dogs because I find them to be more fun companions than cats. I appreciate cats’ independence, but dogs tend to play more and engage more with humans. Plus, no scratches with dogs!”

Ms. Coffey (teacher)

“Dogs are cool? But so are cats? Cats are a lot more mellow while dogs are a lot more active? I like them both.”

Cole Robinson (sophomore)

“Dogs. Dogs are so much more playful. Dogs are also good for protection. It depends which type of dog you have, but dogs are better at protecting. I doubt a cat would attack an intruder. I personally like dogs better, but I’ve also never had a cat.”

Christina Lam (sophomore)

“I like cats because they’re small and friendly. They are also cute, and their purrs are sweet. Dogs are more dangerous than cats.”

Jocelynn Montoya (junior)

Filed Under: Animals, Controversy, Op-Ed Tagged With: Alyna Rei, Cats vs. Dogs

Dress Code: Sound Educational Practice or Suppression of Self Expression?

March 23, 2022 by szachik@pvs.org 1 Comment

Luke Sonderman and Lilah Nick take on the age-old argument over dress codes. Ripped jeans, crop tops, and short shorts all get called into question. Dr. Sherman even contributed to the matter. Read on to find out the fashion fate of Palm Valley. – Editor-in-Chief, Jesse Denyer

By Lilah Nick and Luke Sonderman

Dress Codes:

Dress codes are a common rule set at schools, workplaces, and special events. Most dress codes create a uniform and appropriate look for a body of people, but some dress codes can be unfair and suppressive of self-expression. 

There is no doubt that dress codes do serve important purposes in a professional and educational setting–such as to prevent offensive symbols and wording on clothing and accessories, but do dress codes go too far? Laura Bates, a founder of The Everyday Sexism Project, says, “There’s a real culture being built up through some of these dress codes where girls are receiving very clear messages that male behavior, male entitlement to your body in public space is socially acceptable, but you will be punished [for your clothing choices]” (theatlantic.com). At many high schools in the United States, dress codes restrict clothing that women wear: such as not allowing shoulders or collarbones to be visible or not allowing short skirts, bare midriffs, or leggings. When dress-coded at most schools, students are usually forced to change into other clothing provided by the school which may cause embarrassment and distraction. Sometimes, a student will even get sent home. “That’s crazy that they’re caring more about two more inches of a girl’s thigh being shown than them being in class,” says Anna Huffman who recently graduated from Western Alamance High School in Elon, North Carolina, and helped organize a dress-code protest involving hundreds of participants (theatlantic.com). 

Many schools around the country, and specifically in California, have reformed their restrictions to be more accepting of women’s fashion. Alameda Unified School District in the Bay Area is a new leading example of a no-shame, accepting dress code. This dress code allows tube tops, tight pants, ripped jeans, short skirts, and pajamas as long as they don’t show underwear (USAtoday.com). According to Dani R., Staff Writer of the Grizzly Growler, a young person’s social-justice news source, “Women’s shoulders, knees, or stomach, should not have to be covered up on a hot summer day due to men being ‘distracted’” (grizzly growler.org).

Uniforms:

Having uniforms in private schools is very common, but do uniforms oppress student expression? According to the National Youth Rights Association, “Uniforms restrict students’ individuality, expression, and creativity” (youthrights.org). Although dress codes and uniform systems are being reformed all over the United States, “[T]he percentage of public schools requiring uniforms increased from 12 to 20 percent” (youthrights.org). The NYRA website adds, “The increase in the use of uniforms may be due to a mistaken belief that uniforms prepare students for the workplace and reduce bullying in schools” (youthrights.org). But, there is controversy even amongst the experts on the effect of uniforms on bullying in schools. Tony Volk, Ph.D., Associate Professor at Brock University, stated, “Overall, there is no evidence in bullying literature that supports a reduction in violence due to school uniforms” (Britannica). 

David L. Brunsma, Ph.D., Professor of Sociology at Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University (Virginia Tech), analyzed a group of 10th graders and discovered “no effects of uniforms on absenteeism, behavioral problems (fights, suspensions, etc.), or substance use on campus” and “no effects” on “pro-school attitudes, academic preparedness, and peer attitudes toward school” (Britannica). In addition, Brunsma found a “negative effect of uniforms on academic achievement” (Britannica). Some ways that uniforms have a negative effect is they take away individuality; they can be an additional school expense; and they can be pretty uncomfortable and stressful. Brunsma’s research found that uniforms did not improve academics or reduce bullying with even elementary students and 8th graders (Britannica). “A peer-reviewed study found no significant effects of school uniforms on performance on second-grade reading and mathematics examinations, as well as on 10th-grade reading, mathematics, science, and history examinations.… [In] many of the specifications, the results are actually negative” (Britannica). Studies suggest the common argument schools make–that uniforms take away distractions from the learning environment–has little scientific basis and may actually have a negative effect on a student’s performance. 

Relevance to Palm Valley School:

At Palm Valley, there is only one day a month where students wear their own clothes to school, and many students have to purchase separate clothes to wear on these free-dress days. In the past few years, the uniform dress code has become more relaxed as to what types of pants and shorts are allowed, but the free-dress code has stayed the same. By our interpretation, all preschool, lower school, middle school, and high school students follow the same clothing dress code found in the Students and Families Handbook 2021-2022. When asked to comment, Dr. Sherman, Palm Valley Head of School, countered, “It actually is not the same for Preschool through Upper School.” Dr. Sherman adds, “[I]f you are referring to certain freedoms that you would like to see given to Upper School students, I would encourage you to involve Mr. Coffey in a conversation that you might foster towards that end.”

Palm Valley School is a preschool, lower school, middle school, and college-preparatory upper school. Although it is common for college preparatory schools to have uniform policies, colleges do not implement uniforms unless they are a special academy or military school. It is important for high-school students to be able to express themselves socially before going to college and through allowing students to wear their everyday clothes, students begin to embrace freedom of expression.

In an email interview, Dr. Sherman explains the school’s position: “[T]he objective in having uniforms as part of the PV dress code is to eliminate clothing issues from the social, disciplinary, and academic agenda of our school. Sometimes, clothing can be polarizing and controversial – leading to a distraction from our sole purpose as a school. As students mature, they often choose to express their individuality in overt ways by their choice of clothing and outward dress.” Dr. Sherman went on to say, “[Free dress days are] an attempt to allow students some freedom of expression as it relates to their dress.” 

Palm Valley Student Survey:

In a survey, we asked Middle and Upper School students if they had ever been “dress-coded” (approached about violating the dress code or ever asked to change because of violating the dress code), and, out of 66 responses, 32 had been “dress-coded.” 70% of these “dress-coded” students were female. 

We also collected quotes from students about the dress code. Indiana Behr of the 10th grade said,

“Clothes are a way for people to express themselves, so when we have a day once a month to wear clothes that we are comfortable in, telling girls all of these excessive rules is completely unnecessary.”

Indiana Behr, Sophomore

Ciera Carr from the 8th grade responded to the Handbook guidelines prohibiting cleavage:

“This society really needs to desexualize breasts…. I don’t understand why girls are being taught to be ashamed of their bodies.”

Ciera Carr, 8th Grade

Other students who responded under anonymity said, “We should be comfortable while learning”; “[The dress code] makes [students] feel shameful about their own body”; “Boys have almost no dress-code, on the other hand, girls struggle to find things to wear”; “School should be a place where you can explore yourself freely and respectfully and not be shamed for it.”

As a small preparatory school, it is important to improve the social aspect of the school environment in all ways that we possibly can. In the past five years, too many studies have shown that uniforms have no positive impact on academic performance, and the lack of social expression actually has a negative impact on academic performance and mental health. The Palm Valley School dress code and uniform policy is something that needs to be continually discussed and possibly reformed. As social change progresses, the policies and code on student expression need to change with it.

Filed Under: Controversy, Daily Life, Fashion Tagged With: Dress Code: Sound Educational Practice or Suppression of Self Expression?, Lilah Nick, Luke Sonderman

The Book was Better–or Was It?

March 15, 2022 by szachik@pvs.org 1 Comment

This week, Alyna and Levi tackle the age-old question: Which is better, the book or the movie? I have recently crossed over from the movie side to the book side, making this an interesting article for me. Who knows, you might change your opinion, too. — Super Editor, Jesse Denyer

By Levi Kassinove, Movie Critic, and Alyna Rei, Book Critic

Levi: Look, I know that this sounds pretty cut and dry. Reading has been shown to make you a better writer and generally stimulates your brain in a healthy way. Movies strain your eyes yet simultaneously require less attention to get the point. But, guess what; I don’t care. Watching movies is so much better than reading a book. For starters, you can get the whole plot of a story in under two hours with a movie. If you were reading a book, it would take maybe a week. And besides, who wants to read “She slapped him across the face” when you can just watch the slap? It requires no imagination, and that’s the fun part! And, as far as the “the sequel is bad” phenomenon goes, that’s your own fault for watching a movie with a bad sequel. Lots of books have bad sequels, but you don’t hear me complaining. Here’s another thing: Would you rather rely on your own imagination and perspective to paint the picture of the story, or watch the actors’ and directors’ take on it? They can turn a book into something special with each individual actor adding their own spin to the characters. Do you want to have to stop and imagine “He sheepishly ordered his Chipotle” every single time the author tries to describe something? It’s much easier and faster to just watch an actor’s facial and verbal expressions. 

Alyna: If I were to choose, I would choose to read the book. Don’t get me wrong; I do like to watch movies, but since I love reading, I would choose to learn a story through words on a page. I would say though, if you have a short attention span and are a visual learner, maybe watch the movie. Don’t waste your time. But, if you prefer going through the extra time to learn more detail, I would definitely recommend reading the book. Books have a way of showing more details than movies and allowing the reader to envision so much more than can appear on a mere movie screen. 

Movies and books have a lot of differences. For example, consider your imagination. When you’re reading a book, the process lets you use your own imagination. It gives you a larger scope of what the writer is explaining–and beyond. Whereas in a movie, you’re not using as much of your imagination because it is already presented to you–dictated by the director, set designer, CGI, and the actors. The movie only takes the highlights of what the book represents. 

Okay, maybe the plot of the movie can almost be the same as the plot of a book. But what about the actors? The book can describe what the characters are like. What does their hair look like? What does their face look like? What do their features look like? I wouldn’t say this is the hardest part of making a movie, but I would say this is a challenge. Finding the right cast of characters is hard since the character would have to be very identical to the character in a book. If an actor can’t show or interpret what the writer is depicting in the book, that can ruin the whole meaning of the story.

The book is open to different perspectives. When you are reading a book, you are put into the character’s shoes, even if you are the narrator. You can see what the character is feeling and can switch from each character’s point of view. 

I don’t feel as content at the end of a movie than at the end of a book. With a movie, it ends there with you thinking about the plot that is already determined. With the book, you can think of the outcome or you can think further. I’m not sure if people do that with movies, but I do that with books. I think of what could have happened if one thing was different. 

If you do like watching movies, I’m not stopping you. But if you come at me with the excuse of saying “books are boring” or “books take a long time to read,” I say you are wrong. Not every book is boring, and it won’t take a long time to read if you were to read an actual interesting book.

Books Alyna thinks are far superior to their movie:

  • Easily, the Harry Potter series.
  • The Hunger Games
  • The Maze Runner–the book felt more real than the movie
  • To All The Boys I’ve Loved Before

PVS on Books v. Movies

For me, reading is more of an immersive experience. The movie that I build in my mind while reading the writer’s words puts me more in the situation.

Ms. Coffey

Who is Percy Jackson? Did he write Fight Club? Or, was it Harry Potter?

Luke Sonderman

Why is Tom Hanks playing Da Vinci Code’s Robert Langdon? Langdon is supposed to be ‘Harrison Ford[-like] in Harris tweed.’ And, Tom Cruise as Jack Reacher?! Reacher from the books is 6’5”. Tom Cruise is . . . not.

Ms. Zachik

Filed Under: Controversy, Favorite Books, Fiction Tagged With: Alyna Rei, Levi Kassinove, The Book was Better–or Was It?

The Vending-Machine Crisis

February 9, 2022 by szachik@pvs.org 3 Comments

Abigail Horwitt tells us about the controversy going on in the PVS Upper School. The vending machines are charging $1.25 instead of $1.00 for food and drinks. We find out what the students are trying to do about it and why the 25 cents is such a horrible idea. – Editor Lilah Nick

By Abigail Horwitt, Vending-Machine Objector

Recently, there has been a major problem in the Palm Valley Upper School. About a month ago our vending machines were hijacked. Instead of our drinks and snacks being a dollar, the price was raised to a dollar and 25 cents. This sparked an outrage between both students and teachers. Having to have an extra 25 cents is inconvenient and troublesome. Due to these issues, ASB Co-President Sara Habibipour has taken it into her own hands by putting up signs protesting against the vending machines. With the help of the students, Sara has managed to get many signatures with the hope of bringing back only having to pay a dollar for your Diet Coke. I have heard countless students and teachers complain about not having two dollars, or not having an extra quarter just to buy a snack or drink. The amount of students and teachers going to buy something from the vending machines has decreased due to the pain of carrying around an extra quarter. I used to buy a drink from the vending machine everyday until the price unexpectedly rose an extra 25 cents.

 

Not only is the food overpriced, some of the food had been reported to be stale. The Palm Valley Upper School students are also hoping for a different variety of snacks in the vending machine, since some of the food has been sitting in these machines for most of the school year. The selection is “not good,” says senior Jesse Denyer. Hopefully, the spark of controversy with the vending machines helps raise enough attention to the school vending market and helps to bring change to our machines. 

Bring back our $1 drinks and snacks!

Filed Under: Business, Controversy, Current News, Daily Life, Food Tagged With: Abigail Horwitt, The Vending-Machine Crisis

Scandal in the Universities

April 3, 2019 by szachik@pvs.org Leave a Comment

By Holden Hartle

Editor Hannah challenges bloggers to write on the topic of Conspiracy. Holden goes to the conspiracy in the news . . . the College Admissions Scandal!

As I’m sure most of you know, there has been a big scandal within some of the big name universities. Parents of high school seniors are bribing admissions officers in order to guarantee a spot for their child. In addition, there have been cases in which parents have bribed standardized test proctors to practically take the test for their children, ensuring that they get a higher score. There are even cases of parents bribing coaches of various universities in order for their child to get an admissions offer via fulfilling a team spot.  

Before I become too subjective, let’s begin with the facts. Fifty students from six different states were guaranteed a spot into a big-name university due to bribes from their parents. These aren’t cheap bribes. Most of them are hundreds of thousands of dollars allocated towards a single individual. Note: this money isn’t going to a school. These weren’t donations to the university. If they were donations, the money could go towards constructing a new building or hiring more professors. Rather, hundreds of thousands of dollars were sent to admissions officers, proctors, and coaches.

Some of the colleges involved in the scandal include Yale, Stanford, Georgetown, University of Southern California, University of California Los Angeles, University of San Diego, University of Texas, Wake Forest, and recently, University of California Irvine.  

And now, to get subjective. If you are planning on applying to these universities, still apply. Though this scandal does put a bad name on the university, not the whole university is at fault.  Rather, the bribed individuals should take the blame.

I interviewed Jake Mulé, who applied to UCLA, and asked him if this scandal was a big deal to him and if this scandal affected his perceptions of the school. He said that “it doesn’t deter me from the colleges I am looking at. The problem is within the system. It is hard to be what colleges want us to be. [Bribery] is how people are willing to get ahead.”

Most of the people I interviewed generally agree that the universities aren’t to blame. Asher Mai, who applied to UCLA, USC, and Stanford, said that “It’s not the university’s fault.” Amanda Laule agreed adding that “the universities should make sure their admissions officers aren’t accepting bribes.”

Personally, I agree with Jake that this scandal points out the obvious flaws in the college admissions system. I also agree that colleges should be more attentive to potential bribes that their admissions representatives and coaches may be receiving. But the whole conspiracy affects me on a more personal level. U.S. Attorney Andrew Lelling, the prosecuting attorney, said that “for every student admitted through fraud, an honest and genuinely talented student was rejected.” From someone who has felt the pain of a rejection email, it is so difficult for me to watch these people have their path to college paid for by their parents, and at the same time, have to watch my talented friends get denied from their dream universities. And consider this: even though there are only fifty cases that have surfaced, this is something that has happened in years past, and something that doesn’t look like it’s going away anytime soon.

Conspiracy Editor: Hannah Hall

Filed Under: Conspiracy, Controversy, Op-Ed Tagged With: Holden Hartle

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • 2

About

We are the Palm Valley Firebirds of Rancho Mirage, California. Join us in our endeavors. Venture through the school year with us, perusing the artwork of our students, community, and staff. Our goal is to share the poems, stories, drawings and photographs, essays and parodies that come out of our school. Welcome aboard!