the bird on fire

The Palm Valley School Student Blog

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Powered by Genesis

Oola’s Hidden Articles

February 1, 2019 by szachik@pvs.org Leave a Comment

By Dayton Kennard

If you haven’t heard of Oola, it’s basically a website that posts articles on restaurants, food, and houseware. However, if you found out about it through its ads on apps such as Snapchat, you’d expect something a bit different.

In its ads on Snapchat, it links you to an article similar to a “top-ten” article, such as “People Share The Stories Behind Why They Left A Terrible Tip Or No Tip At All While Dining Out*” and “Servers Share The Most Outlandish, Idiotic Thing A Customer Has Ever Done**” to name a few. After reading one, you may be enticed to click on one of the tabs on the Oola website to read more articles like this, but to your surprise, you’ll find nothing of the sort. Instead, the website is full of articles with food recipes for special occasions, everyday dinners, and other recipe-related articles. You may try all of the tabs on the top of their website, but you won’t be able to find the article you just read.

“What’s happening?” you may ask yourself. The truth is, these articles are often hidden in categories that are not listed in plain sight, such as “Stories” and “Restaurants,” which are sub-categories of “Life in Flavor.” Some articles, however, are listed in easily accessible categories such as “Social Life,” but even if you look through the articles in that category you won’t be able to find anything like what you’ve just read. Why is this? It’s likely something similar to YouTube’s “Unlisted” videos, where you won’t see the content when looking at a general page/tab that you’d expect them to be in and that you can only access if the creator of that content gives you a direct link to it.

Let’s talk about the Oola articles themselves now. They’re formatted as multiple brief paragraphs telling stories related to the article’s overall main point, and each has an image that’s somewhat related to the story. These paragraphs are encased in quotation marks, indicating that they are from different people. If we look harder at these posts, though, there will only be one author attributed for the post (such as Brianna Morton), and all of the pictures will be from a stock photo company (such as Shutterstock or Flicker). The photos will have the username of the person who originally uploaded it, and if you click on the name of the author you will see more articles with this same style. Furthermore, these articles will almost never use the actual name of the restaurants, with the acception of a few references such as “owl-themed restaurant” and “subway-themed restaurant.”

While these articles may be entertaining, they are most certainly click-bait articles intended for the purpose of advertisement and popularity. If you’re interested in reading a few of them, there are links to two of the stories at the bottom of this post.

Editor: Leo Milmet

*https://www.oola.com/social-life/2298681/people-share-the-stories-behind-why-they-left-a-terrible-tip-or-no-tip-at-all-while-dining-out/**https://www.oola.com/restaurants/2297741/servers-share-the-most-outlandish-idiotic-thing-a-customer-has-ever-done/

Filed Under: Uncategorized

places i recommend you visit

February 1, 2019 by szachik@pvs.org 2 Comments

By Makena Behnke, World Traveler Blogger

i’m quite a seasoned traveler, but i don’t mention it much because i don’t want to seem like that one kid that came back from vacation and never shut up about their summer trip. but here are many places that i think everyone should visit.

of course, you have the classic bucket-list places like,

  • Paris, France
  • Rome, Italy
  • London, England
  • Amsterdam, Netherlands
  • Venice, Italy
  • Florence, Italy

here are some “less traveled” places,

  • Auckland, New Zealand
  • Dublin, Ireland
  • Cologne, Germany
  • Bern, Switzerland
  • Zurich, Switzerland
  • Antwerp, Belgium
  • Granada, Spain
  • Córdoba, Spain
  • Pamplona, Spain
  • Christchurch, New Zealand
  • St. Tropez, France
  • Ramatuelle, France

so, there you go. happy travels.

Cologne, Germany


Filed Under: Advice, Culture, The World, Travel Tagged With: Makena Behnke

We’re Looking For Feedback: Blog Survey

January 30, 2019 by szachik@pvs.org Leave a Comment

By Luke Langlois

Thebirdonfire.org is a wonderful blog from the perspective of the bloggers. We’re celebrating three years up and running, over 16,000 views, 500 comments, and 140 plus subscribers. We love to slap our sophisticated schoolyard shenanigans on the blog, but we don’t always know what our readers are thinking about said shenanigans. So, today, for the new semester, we would love it, if, instead of reading the blog, you interact with the blog! Your responses will remain anonymous, so have at us.

Please click the link below to take the survey.

https://goo.gl/forms/9v2XwHXMtTEFo64v2

Editor: Holden Hartle

Filed Under: Advice, Media, Technology Tagged With: We’re Looking For Feedback: Blog Survey

Rhetorical Fallacies That YOU Should be Aware of: Part II

January 30, 2019 by szachik@pvs.org Leave a Comment

By Luke Langlois

This is the second of my two-part post explaining rhetorical fallacies. For the first eight fallacies, check out my last post. For the uninitiated, rhetorical fallacies (as defined by the University of Texas at Austin Undergraduate Writing Center) are rhetorical strategies commonly used in arguments that “do not allow for the open, two-way exchange of ideas upon which meaningful conversations depend. . . . [T]hey distract the reader with various appeals instead of using sound reasoning.” Now, let us get right back into these fallacies.

9. Begging the Question: This is probably the toughest fallacy to understand, and explaining it in words does not really do it justice. It’s best to think of this fallacy as “improper circular reasoning.” For example, if you get in some trouble at school and have your friend vouch for you, your teacher is naturally going to ask, “How am I supposed to trust your friend?” It would be “begging the question” if you responded with “Well, I vouch for my friend, and my friend vouches for me!” It’s circular, and it doesn’t work. Begging the question assumes the truth of a conclusion, rather than supporting a conclusion.

10. Straw Man Argument: A straw man argument misdirects and oversimplifies the argument. For example, if I wanted to change the face of the person on the $2 bill, someone making a straw man argument might accuse me of hating the United States and its history because I want to change the person on the $2 bill.

11. Sentimental Appeal: A sentimental appeal argument attempts to appeal to the emotions, the sentiments of the reader, so that they are not actually using their logic to dissect the idea. “Please, give us donations, or these puppies will continue to freeze and suffer.” It does not matter if the organization asking for donations is shady, we must save the puppies!

12. Red Herring: A red herring is an attempt to shift attention away from the argued issue by throwing in a whole new issue that does not logically connect to the initial issue. If a world leader is making a speech about having to go to war and then starts talking about their nationalistic pride, they are attempting to distract listeners from the fact of the war with the fact of their nationalistic pride.

13. Scare Tactics: This is probably another one of the most commonly used fallacies. The speaker tries to frighten the audience into agreeing with the speaker. “If we do not invade and conquer Canada, they will steal our children, our land, and our lives!” Whoever the speaker is wants to convince the audience that Canada should be invaded by making the audience fear for their children, land, and lives.

14. Bandwagon Appeals: A speaker using a bandwagon appeal tries to “use the masses” to convince the listener of a certain point. Children often try to use this fallacy to convince their parents to buy them something.” All of my friends have it, so I should too!” Parents often counter this fallacy by asking their children if they would jump off of a cliff if their friends were doing it.

15. Dogmatism: This fallacy occurs when the speaker assumes that their logic is beyond any sort of refute or question. “I am the leader of the milk enthusiast group; milk is the only acceptable beverage on this planet, and there is no question about it!” The speaker basically presents their idea as perfection, and does not open themselves up to discuss their idea. Clearly, this speaker is not going to be listening to any nonsense about almond milk beverage.

16. Equivocation: Equivocation is when the speaker partly tells the truth, and deliberately hides the whole truth. For example, if the speaker said, “I will never drive into anyone with my car!” and then proceeded to hit someone with a stolen car, that would be equivocation. The speaker said that they wouldn’t drive into anyone with their car, but then went on to hit someone with a stolen car. The speaker partly told the truth.

17. Faulty Analogy: As the name might suggest, this fallacy occurs when the speaker tries to convey the idea using an analogy, but the analogy does not live up to the original idea. “Of course we should ditch school! If someone was holding you hostage, wouldn’t you want to escape?” While millions of children around the world would see no problem with this analogy, escaping a hostage situation is not comparable to ditching school. Analogies can be a great way to try to explain an idea, but the analogy should properly match up with the idea.

These have been the rhetorical fallacies as listed by The Princeton Review! Calling them “fallacies” is not to say that they are not effective persuasive strategies. In fact, I’d be willing to bet that you had a couple of mass-media examples in mind as you read those fallacies. However, if you are trying to legitimately convince someone of the merits and value of your idea, it’s probably best to steer clear of these fallacies. If you want to know more, check out my first post (if you haven’t already) to read about the first eight rhetorical fallacies.

Editor: Leo Milmet

Filed Under: Op-Ed Tagged With: Luke Langlois, Rhetorical Fallacies: Part 2

Love Poem

January 30, 2019 by szachik@pvs.org Leave a Comment

By Jeremy Cheng

你的光芒照耀着我

使我感受着温暖

如同清晨的阳光沐浴着我

看着你的一颦一笑

即便什么也不做

我也觉得温暖开心


You shine on me,

Make me feel warm.

You are the morning sun, baking me in its heat when I open the blinds to reveal your brightness.

Your smile penetrates the window with its beauty.

Even though you do nothing,

I feel glad and warm.

Editor: Leo Milmet

Filed Under: Culture, Poetry Tagged With: Jeremy Cheng, Love Poem

Love Poem #2

January 30, 2019 by szachik@pvs.org Leave a Comment

By Jeremy Cheng

阳光像一个精湛艺术家

他的光芒照耀在你的脸上

制作出一副世界独一无二金我一人可观的绝世美画

多么想要抱着你一起入睡,听着你呼吸。 安稳入睡。

起床后第一眼

你就在我的身边。


Sun is a professional artist.

His light shines on your face

creates a unique second-to-none painting,

and it is only for me.

How I want to sleep beside you,

listen to you breathe and sleep comfortably.

The first eye after getting up,

you next to me.

Editor: Holden Hartle

Filed Under: Culture, Poetry, Uncategorized Tagged With: Jeremy Cheng, Love2 Poem

Behnke’s Bops

January 28, 2019 by szachik@pvs.org 1 Comment

Does your playlist need a shot of adrenaline? Makena has a new list of suggestions.

By Makena Behnke, Blogger Songster

here are some songs that for some reason hit me right in my feelings. some are happy, nostalgic, sad, or basically whatever other feelings i can think of. anyway, i love them.

  • Sorrento by Paul Anka
  • Someday by The Strokes
  • Dope on a Rope by The Growlers
  • Lucy In The Sky With Diamonds by The Beatles
  • Threat of Joy by The Strokes
  • Not My Baby by Alvvays
  • Make Someone Happy by Jimmy Durante
  • Best Friend by Rex Orange County
  • Birthday by The Sugarcubes
  • Pablo Picasso by David Bowie
  • Modern Things by Björk
  • Tupelo Honey by Van Morrison
  • Be My Man by Jill Barber

Editor: Holden Hartle

Filed Under: Advice, Culture, Music Tagged With: Behnke's Bops, Makena Behnke

Holden Rants About a Topic That Isn’t Really Relevant But is Still Kind of Interesting Part 3

January 25, 2019 by szachik@pvs.org 2 Comments

The National Milk Producers Federation: Got Milk?

By Holden Hartle

Now, I love milk just as much as the next person, but would I dedicate my career to lobbying for it? Well, no, but Randy Mooney would. He is the Chairman of Dairy Farmers of America, Inc., which works within the interest group the National Milk Producers Federation (NMPF). I’ve never thought about it, but the dairy industry is booming in America (we do love our butter).

The NMPF is big on issues like the selling of raw milk. As you may know, milk must be pasteurized so as to get rid of bacteria. And, apparently, it is within the bounds of the law to sell raw milk that can make the consumer sick. In 2018, The NMPF has brought down legislation that makes raw milk more available, such as Amendment 30 from the 2018 Farm Bill. This amendment would have removed the restrictions that are currently in place that prevent the interstate sale of raw milk. But, the NMPF, along with Paul Ryan and Nancy Pelosi, shot down the amendment, stating that it would be, “an unnecessary risk to consumer safety and public health.”

The NMPF is also big on helping the environment. They are in the process of developing the Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure (SPCC). This is in place to clean up oil and fuel spillages on farms. Also, they started the National Air Emissions Study (NAEMS), which measures the pollution emitted by dairy farms and is finding ways to limit them.

Possibly the issue that the NMPF cares about the most is the price of milk. The Federal Government stopped regulating milk prices, meaning that the prices are very volatile based off of supply and demand. Instead of allowing milk prices to go up so that the milk industry can make more a profit, the NMPF is working on an “insurance-based federal safety net program to give farmers an effective tool to protect their farms in times of extremely low milk prices or high feed costs.” In short, instead of milk prices getting too low and farmers not making money, the NMPF is working on a way to prevent farmers from going bankrupt. Instead of being pro-industry, the NMPF is more concerned with the financial well-being of farmers.

On a separate note, if you are interested in doing graduate research on the dairy industry, the NMPF has a scholarship just for you, the NMPF National Dairy Leadership Scholarship Program. The past winner was Isaac Salfer, who is in the process of getting his doctorate in animal sciences and is studying the effect of nutrient intake on circadian rhythms in the mammary gland of dairy cows.

In my research of the NMPF, I have come to the conclusion that the NMPF is adorable. As far as I can tell, the National Milk Producers Federation is genuinely interested in selling milk that is “safe, wholesome, and nutritious.” Nothing Federation members do, at least the things they promote, project them as money-hungry and greedy. They are active in changing legislation that promotes animal cruelty, and they care about the environment. And, on top of all that, they are creating a safety net for farmers if the price of their product falls too low. And on top of all that, they have a scholarship for graduate students who are pursuing a career in the dairy industry. Their actions seem like a certain brand of milk–wholesome.

If you would like to learn more of the NMPF, the link to the website referenced is http://www.nmpf.org

Editor: Leo Milmet

Filed Under: Culture, Food, Politics, The World Tagged With: Holden Hartle, The National Milk Producers Federation: Got Milk?

Is time travel possible?

January 25, 2019 by szachik@pvs.org Leave a Comment

By James Zheng, Blogger and Amateur Physicist

I know it’s kinda unusual to see a title like this, especially from an anime reviewer. As I was considering what anime is worthy of recommending, I came up with this interesting topic to share with you guys. Also, to interpret this topic in the best way there will be some physics stuff and technical terms, but I will not make this subject sound really complicated or ridiculous. What I will do is express everything in a simple way.

As the most intelligent beings on the Earth, humans have infinite ambition in the realm of science. An example of this is the invention of new gadgets. And one of the most controversial, or even most impractical ideas, is time travel. Describing time travel is just as difficult as unravelling a thousand threads twisted together since we don’t really have a solid concept of it, fundamentally. It’s a process of travelling to the past or future, which sounds absurd, right? So, this wonderful scientific idea contradicts with the Theory of Relativity (a basic theory about space and gravitation which also introduces all the special phenomenon in physics) and even disobeys the principle of nature (the most basic principle that applies to the whole universe about how things change).

Here is one of the biggest concerns, the temporal paradox, also known as Fermi’s Paradox. It could entirely negate time travel while also telling how time travel could lead to a false interaction between cause and effect. Simply put, there are many examples to explain what a temporal paradox is. Let me give a common example: let me assume that person A went back to his past, then person A killed his father (person B) before B got married, and the existence of person A turns out to be an unknown being since if person A killed his unmarried father (person B), person A would not have been born. The logic of this example is really clear; the cause is that person A killed B and therefore cannot be borne of B. In this application of temporal paradox, when we travel to the past, we can’t interfere with the reality in the past, similar to the principle of nature that humans cannot change something which already happened in the past; otherwise, it would create complete chaos.

However, as I mentioned earlier, mankind has limitless ambition. And, we would all agree that temporal paradox sounds absolutely reasonable and unattainable; actually the realm of science ignores one possibility, an assumption called parallel universe. At this time, let’s go back to that same example to explicate parallel universe. What would happen if A kills his unmarried father B this time? There will be two universes, or paths split from A’s life. One path is the history that B died, but another one is the original history that A can never change, and which means the truth that B died still remains but actually A will go to the path that B died and stay in that path. Moreover, parallel universe is not the only factor that could possibly debunk temporal paradox; there are plenty of other circumstances that could affect it.

Now let’s see how could we disobey the Theory of Relativity and principle of nature in a “correct” way. At first, you might see a few articles which claim if humans discover a speed faster than light, time travel will be plausible. But, all the evidence and reasons that they have given so far are just abstract. I am not criticizing them. Scientists often use sophisticated words and concepts that people cannot understand, which they normally would see as something impressive, so the majority of people just don’t get it. And, in my opinion, to produce a special phenomenon called a wormhole (like a tunnel that links two alternative timelines) and look for a high gravitational field will possibly accomplish time travel. Secondly, before I tell you how a wormhole works, I am going to explain it. A wormhole is a passage that connects two universes, which also refers to two time points so that it allows a person to travel through time, certainly a one-way trip (by the way, I write some extra crazy information about wormholes at the end of this article;, check it out if you want to). At some point, wormholes will definitely be a breakthrough if scientists find proof to validate them… wait… haven’t they proven it already? Although it’s only a hypothesis, it’s indeed a scientific theory that some well-known physicists such as Ludwig Flamm and Nathan Rosen were trying to prove.

How about high gravitational field then? First, there is one thing you need to know. On any planet, when gravity is elevated extremely high or low, the time is either slowing down or speeding up. Same as on earth, our standard comprehension about time is determined by gravity. As a result, time is vulnerable, by which I mean it has many flaws, perhaps when you go to a planet that is far away from the Earth, there will be a gigantic discrepancy of time between that planet and Earth. The discrepancy will depend on how different the gravity is as well so that decides how fast time moves.

Finally, I hope you liked this article written by an amateur who is truly interested in physics. All of the above views are absolutely my personal and subjective researched views. I do not mean to make this topic contentious, but please leave your comments or questions, or correct some places that you think I am wrong. I will happily respond.  

Note: Here is the crazy information of wormholes. Theoretically, wormholes are space tunnels connecting two distant timelines, just like the whirlpools in the ocean, which are everywhere but short-lasting. These temporal and spatial vortices are caused by the rotation of the stars and the attraction of gravity. Just as a whirlpool can make the water surface closer to the bottom, it can make two local spaces which are far away from each other very close instantaneously. But some people assume that a certain dark matter can keep the wormhole open because some of them contain positive energy and negative mass at the same time; it can create a repelling effect to prevent wormhole closure.

Sources referenced:

https://baike.baidu.com/item/%E8%99%AB%E6%B4%9E/118082?fr=aladdin
https://baike.baidu.com/item/%E6%97%B6%E9%97%B4%E6%BC%8F%E6%B4%9E/6693486?fr=aladdin

Editor: AJ Patencio

Filed Under: Science, Technology Tagged With: Is time travel possible?, James Zheng

Rhetorical Fallacies That YOU Should be Aware of! Part I

January 23, 2019 by szachik@pvs.org Leave a Comment

By Luke Langlois

The AP English Language and Composition class is full of wonders. For instance, we took a brief look at rhetorical fallacies. Instantly, I thought to myself “Wow, this would make an excellent post for thebirdonfire.org!” Rhetorical fallacies, as defined by the University of Texas at Austin Undergraduate Writing Center, are rhetorical strategies, usually used in arguments that “do not allow for the open, two-way exchange of ideas upon which meaningful conversation depend. Instead, they distract the reader with various appeals instead of using sound reasoning.” Today, let us take a look at some common rhetorical fallacies. Use this information as you will. Sometimes, fallacies are key parts of highly effective arguments.

  1. The ad hominem argument (Latin for “to the man”): An ad hominem argument criticizes an opposing idea by attacking the person with the idea, rather than criticizing the actual idea or its merits. Something like “Your financial advice is invalid because you’re old and crusty!” is an ad hominem argument. I have placed this at the top of the post because this is, by far, the most commonly seen fallacy. In fact, by the time you have read this, I bet multiple instances of this fallacy have already popped into your mind.  
  2. Argument from Authority: An argument from authority is an argument where a large portion of the merit of the argument comes from the fact that the speaker is someone well-known. Basically, a commercial starring a celebrity is an argument from authority. “Why, of course I should buy Gatorade! Steph Curry told me that it is THE most refreshing beverage on Earth.”
  3. Appeal to Ignorance: I’m not sure how to define this one, so I’ll give the Princeton Review’s definition. “An appeal to ignorance is based on the assumption that whatever has not been proven false must be true (or similarly, whatever has not been proven true must be false). For example, nobody can prove that Santa Claus is not actually real. Therefore, Santa Claus is real. Conversely, nobody has proven the existence of Santa Claus; therefore, Santa Claus is not real.
  4. Hasty Generalization: A hasty generalization occurs when a writer intentionally tries to lead the reader to a conclusion without actually providing a sufficient amount of evidence for that conclusion. “The human race is doomed. I just got mugged!” This fallacy is also sometimes known as a sampling error because the speaker is basing their argument off of a single or very limited number of experiences.
  5. Non sequitur (Latin for “it doesn’t follow”): A non sequitur statement is a statement that logically does not follow what comes before it. “Because Barack Obama is no longer President, all snails are able to move slightly faster.” Unless you happen to believe the end of Obama’s presidency brought a speed boost to snails, this is a non sequitur statement.
  6. False Dichotomy: A false dichotomy makes the reader only consider two possible extremes of an idea, when there are many more possibilities that come in between the two presented ones. “Starting a company is a high-risk, high-reward endeavor. You either monumentally fail, or you’re Amazon!” This speaker is arguing that a business is either a failure, or a multibillion dollar juggernaut. There are varying degrees of success in between “failure” and “juggernaut,” depending on your own philosophy, of course.
  7. Slippery Slope: A slippery-slope argument suggests that drastic consequences will arise from a minor cause. “Don’t you dare eat that cookie. Before you know it, you’ll be morbidly obese!” Sometimes, this fallacy may overlap with the hasty-generalization fallacy.
  8. Faulty Causality: A faulty causality is exactly what it sounds like. The author attempts to set up a cause-and-effect relationship where one does not actually exist. “Everyone who drinks water is going to die.” Yes, everyone dies, but, to our current knowledge, it’s not because of drinking water.

This post is getting a bit lengthy, so I’m going to cut it off here. However, there are many other rhetorical fallacies that are to be discovered. Stay tuned for the next post on RHETORICAL FALLACIES.

Editor: Makena Behnke

Filed Under: Advice Tagged With: Luke Langlois, Rhetorical Fallacies That YOU Should be Aware of!

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • …
  • 82
  • 83
  • 84
  • 85
  • 86
  • …
  • 128
  • Next Page »

About

We are the Palm Valley Firebirds of Rancho Mirage, California. Join us in our endeavors. Venture through the school year with us, perusing the artwork of our students, community, and staff. Our goal is to share the poems, stories, drawings and photographs, essays and parodies that come out of our school. Welcome aboard!