the bird on fire

The Palm Valley School Student Blog

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Powered by Genesis

Instagram Poetry

January 11, 2019 by szachik@pvs.org 1 Comment

A submission by Poet-Blogger Jeremy Cheng

Jeremy submitted the following poem to “Rattle’s” Instagram-Poet Competition.

Want to submit an Instagram Poem as well? Here are the specs:

  • Publication: Rattle magazine
  • Publication type: online, print
  • Editor: Timothy Green
  • Word count: Send up to four poems; no line limit provided
  • Payment: $100/poem
  • Rights the publisher asks for: First publication rights plus exclusive rights for one year after publication. Author retains copyright.
  • Deadline: January 15, 2019
  • Publication date: Summer 2019
  • Response time: Not specified.
  • Format: Not specified. Standard manuscript format is a good bet.
  • Will they take simultaneous submissions? Not specified.
  • Will they take multiple submissions? Yes, but include all in a single document. Read more about multiple and simultaneous submissions.
  • Will they take reprints? “…we won’t consider poems that have been published in books, magazines, or newspapers, in print or online. We will, however, consider poems that have only been self-published to blogs, message boards, or social media accounts.”.
  • Who to contact with questions: www.rattle.com/info/contact/

Filed Under: Poetry Tagged With: Jeremy Cheng, mu_yee_, Robot

Should Sports Players be Paid Less?

January 10, 2019 by szachik@pvs.org 1 Comment


By Sports Enthusiast and Blogger Holden Hartle

In short, no. People like to say, “How can athletes get paid millions of dollars just to play a game? It’s unfair to the rest of the working class who actually has to work for their next paycheck.” I understand this hypothetical person’s argument. In its simplest, these athletes are getting paid ridiculous amounts of money to play a child’s game. But, I do have some problems with this hypothetical person’s argument.

Consider this. The NBA earns a total of $7.37 billion per year. How the NBA determines the salary cap (it’s actually very complicated so this is the “For Dummies” version) is they take the total NBA revenue, halve it, then divide it by thirty because there are thirty teams in the NBA. After the other math that goes into it, you get just over $100 million per team. The salary cap is how much money a team is allowed to spend on players’ contracts. So, as the NBA earns more revenue, the teams can spend more money on contracts. But imagine if teams were given less of a percentage of the NBA’s revenue. That means that players would get paid less but that money has to go somewhere. Instead, it would go to people like Adam Silver, who is currently commissioner of the NBA. It seems fairer that the players are getting 50% of the NBA’s revenue, rather than Adam Silver have all of it to himself.

Furthermore, consider the fact that each NBA player has some amount of influence. Sure someone like Antonio Blakeney will have less influence than LeBron James, but there are still people that will look to Blakeney as a role model. And though maybe this influence isn’t worth millions of dollars, it is at least worth something.

Personally, I don’t think that NBA players should be paid less. I think that they are paid a fair percentage of the NBA’s revenue and that it would be unfair if they were paid a lesser percentage. Though, yes, in its simplest, they are playing a child’s game, but consider the fact that they are playing it at the highest level in the entire world, and the fact that each NBA player has some influence over some group of people.

This has been Part 2 of Holden Rants About a Topic That Isn’t Really Relevant But is Still Kind of Interesting.

Editor: A.J. Patencio

Filed Under: Op-Ed, Sports Tagged With: Holden Hartle, Should Sports Players be Paid Less?

2nd-Place Short-Story Winner

January 9, 2019 by szachik@pvs.org Leave a Comment

By Harlow Berny

Hello! Here is the 2nd-place winner of the Halloween Short Horror Story Competition written by Marianne Capetz! It was a tough choice, but ultimately the Masked Rabbit and his story “The Darkness” won 1st place, and Erik Bearman came in 3rd place with his story “Cobwebs.” Enjoy!

The Child

By Marianne Capetz

Miss Alice Wittlebee was a very normal woman; in fact, she was possibly the most normal person in her apartment complex. Everyday she got up at 5:30 on the dot and had a cup of tea with one sugar. She would then sit by her window and read until it was too dark to see the pages. Everyday without fail she followed her routine, until one afternoon she heard a sharp knock on the door. Miss Alice slowly got up and walked to the door. When she opened it, a small face was peering up at her
“I don’t want to buy anything,” Miss Alice snapped at the wide eyed child. The child continued to silently stare at her. Something about this child perturbed her; perhaps it was the odd way the child’s eyes seemed to dilate. Miss Alice quickly dismissed this absurd idea. This child was nothing but a small disruption in her day. She turned to ask the child if it was lost, but before she could say anything the child began to speak.
“Hello Alice. Did you miss me?” the child’s head tilted slightly and its eyes seemed to widen.

Rather taken back by the child’s words Miss Alice responded, “Miss you? Child, I’ve never seen you in my life.” She watched the child’s mesmerizing eyes continue to expand.
“Did you miss me?” The child asked again. Miss Alice rubbed her eyes as the child’s eyes had grown even more.
“Please leave, I have much to do today and cannot be bothered.” Miss Alice said with a slight waver in her voice. She went to leave, but stopped. Her feet suddenly felt very heavy and sat like cinder blocks on the ground. She turned once more to glance at the strange child. She quickly found that she could not move her eyes away from the child. Miss Alice was trapped by the unwavering gaze of the peculiar child.
Miss Alice had never had such a bizarre experience. Nor did she expect to be caught by the stare of this child. As the child’s eyes grew, the room began to change. The walls became white and plush and the floor began to soften. Her arms were encased by something warm and secure. Miss Alice slowly sank to the cushioned floor. She looked around the room and saw that the child had disappeared. She tried to free her ams from the strange item pinning them to her body, but found she was stuck. Her escape efforts began to become more and more frantic. She was so focused on her attempt to free her arms that she didn’t notice the woman enter the room. She didn’t even feel the needle prick her skin, until she drifted off into a dreamless sleep.
The nurse carefully removed the needle from Patient #48 and set it on the metal tray that she had rolled in earlier. She picked up the large folder sitting on the table and quickly jotted down some notes. She looked at Alice and sighed; Patient #48 seemed to be getting better. She was so close to being released back into society. The nurse shook her head and walked out. All the patients on her floor had been complaining about an encounter with a strange child before they would relapse into insanity again. She told the other nurses about these complaints, but no one had believed her. Lost in thought she turned down the hall and was shocked to see a small child standing by the door.
“Hello Jane. Did you miss me?”

Editor: Luke Langlois

Filed Under: Arts & Letters Awards, Fiction Tagged With: 2nd Place Short Story Winner, Harlow Berny

The Lord’s Animals and The Devil’s–A Fairy Tale Re-Telling

January 9, 2019 by szachik@pvs.org Leave a Comment

Retold By Harlow Berny

Centuries ago, in a long forgotten kingdom, God created all animals and chose the wolf to be his dog. God had forgotten, however, to create the goat. The devil saw this and began to create his own animals, among which was the goat that God had forgotten. He gave the goats long, bushy tails, but when they grazed in the pastures they caught in hedges. The devil grew tired of untangling his goats, so he herded them together and bit their tails down, leaving them with the stubs we see today.

After He knew they wouldn’t get caught again, He let his goats roam the fields alone, but soon God saw how they gnawed at fruit trees, chomped through hardy vines, and devoured blooming wildflowers. God became distressed and sent his wolves to stop the goats, and in doing so the goats were torn to pieces. The devil heard the cries of his goats and returned to find nothing but blood-stained grass and wolves. He went to God and screamed, “Why have your creatures destroyed mine!?”

“Why have you created things that do harm?” God responded.

“Damn you! My creations ate nothing but plants; yours are the ones that commit murder!”

“The goats had eaten trees, vines, and flowers instead of fruits and vegetables. They were hardly innocent creatures.”

“My thoughts and being run on chaos and disorder, and as such my creations can have no other nature. You owe me heavily for the herd you’ve killed,” said the devil.

“I will pay you as soon as the oak leaves fall. Come then and your money will be ready.”

The devil waited for Autumn, and once he heard the final leaf drop to the ground and crunch beneath a human’s foot, he went forth to God and demanded his due. However, once he arrived he was shocked by what he saw.

“As you can see, not all the oak leaves have fallen, devil,” God said gesturing to the old church behind the woods, which was surrounded by tall hollyoaks.

“Evergreens?!” the devil shouted. “You’ve tricked me, old man!”

“Not quite. I said when all the oak leaves fall, not when Autumn comes. You will have to wait until those trees decide that they’ve lived long enough, and are ready to rest.”

“Damn you! Damn you and all your creations!” The devil huffed out flames before leaving again with his goats. He pulled their eyes out and replaced them with his own, so that he may watch over them and alert them of danger. This is how goats got their short tails and devil eyes, and why the devil likes to assume their shape when walking upon the earth.

Editor: Makena Behnke

A Re-Telling of Grimm’s

Filed Under: Fairy Tales Tagged With: The Lord’s Animals and The Devil’s--A Fairy Tale Re-Telling

MIDNIGHT

January 7, 2019 by szachik@pvs.org 2 Comments

By Leo Milmet

the clock struck midnight.

he was alone on the balcony.

all the people who had disturbed the peace

were long gone.

and there was peace.

quiet.

the contrasting lights of the moonlight and his cigarette

drew more of his attention than any care in the world.

it was midnight on a breezy summer night,

and he sat, contemplating his life.

to his surprise, he felt

joy.

Editor: Holden Hartle

Filed Under: Poetry Tagged With: Leo Milmet, Midnight

FLASHLIGHT

December 20, 2018 by szachik@pvs.org 3 Comments

By Leo Milmet

in the dark

i see the light.

you.

you’re the light.

you’re my flashlight

in the constant power outage of life.

sometimes the light you shine is white and bright, and

almost appears to

restore the power.

other times it’s just a glimmer of light,

no larger than a rosebud,

a soft petal of light

with a narrow focus, and not much flood.

that’s okay.

i don’t trip and fall in the dark, and i know that’s

got something to do with you.

Editor: Luke Langlois

Filed Under: Poetry Tagged With: FLASHLIGHT, Leo Milmet

Holden Rants About a Topic That Isn’t Really Relevant But is Still Kind of Interesting: Part 1

December 20, 2018 by szachik@pvs.org 4 Comments

How Much Symbolism is Too Much?

By Holden Hartle

I have the pleasure of taking a class with Mr. Griffin. He introduced the idea of symbolism to me when I was a freshman, and now I am reintroduced to it as a senior. He has opened my eyes to a whole new way of reading a story. Currently in class we are discussing short stories. Some ideas are far fetched–like a card game representing the Irish economy. The discussions we have in class explore the story beneath the story, as Mr. Griffin likes to put it.

For example, we read the story A&P by John Updike, in which a teenager quits his job as a cashier to go chase some girls in bikinis. At least, this is the story on the surface level. If you go one level deeper, the story is kind of a coming-of-age story, as the cashier quits his job because it proves that he can be autonomous. You can even go one step deeper and look at the lighting of the story. The “fake” lighting inside the store conveys the illusion that the teenager can actually go out and get these girls, but when he steps into the sunlight, or the “real” lighting, he is met with “reality” and the fact that he can’t get those girls.

But when does symbolism go too far? How deep can you look into a story before your symbolic interpretation just becomes wrong? Well, as with most cases, there are two sides to the story. One side can argue that whatever the reader can extrapolate from the story as symbolism should be taken as such, but the other side may argue that sometimes the author may just want to write something for the sake of writing it. Not all pieces of literature have to have symbolism. The common example is when an author writes, “The curtains were painted blue.” Mr. Griffin and I may look at this sentence and say that the curtains convey the protagonist’s sadness, and possibly his loneliness, when in fact the author may have just written that the curtains were blue, with no intended symbolism whatsoever.

There is another side of the story that raises an interesting question. Sometimes, symbolism reveals secrets about the author, regardless of whether or not they put it in consciously. If we use the curtain example again, what if we were to say that the curtains are blue because the author was feeling depressed at that point in time. Is that fair to say? In my opinion, no. It is unfair to extrapolate symbolism and relate it to the author, because you could stretch an idea to the point that you could say the author is a sexist for using a color primarily associated with boys.

So, yes, Mr. Griffin and the AP Literature class have a grand ol’ time “over analyzing” passages, but there is a point where symbolic analysis becomes too much. Personally, I believe that the author and the piece should remain separate entities. You, as the reader, can take whatever you want out of the story, but what you take from the story shouldn’t fall back onto the author. This has been Holden Rants About a Topic That Isn’t Really Relevant But is Still Kind of Interesting: Part 1.

Editor: AJ Patencio

Filed Under: Fiction, Op-Ed, Uncategorized Tagged With: Holden Hartle

Top 25 Buffy The Vampire Slayer Episodes: #10-1

December 19, 2018 by szachik@pvs.org Leave a Comment

By Leo Milmet, Extreme Buffy Enthusiast


Warning: There are spoilers for all 7 seasons of Buffy The Vampire Slayer in this post. Also, this post is designed for people who are very familiar with the series — there will be references to certain scenes, lines, etc. that simply may not make sense if you aren’t at least a casual fan of Buffy. I have tried to minimize this while also speaking to die-hard fans of the series such as myself.

I previously revealed my choices for #25-11 on my list of the top 25 Buffy The Vampire Slayer episodes. Now we’re down to the top 10! I love this show so much. I could go on about it all day, but as I fear that this post may get a little long, I’ll shut up and get on with my choices!

10. “Fool For Love” (Season 5, Episode 7) — It’s very rare that a single episode has such a long-lasting major impact, but “Fool For Love” is relevant from the moment it begins all the way until the series’s final moments. This episode is, as vampire Spike might say, “bloody brilliant.” Its exploration of what it means to be a Slayer is one of the more important themes throughout the series, executed nowhere better than here. While watching the show up to this point, one may have always had the thought remaining in the back of their head, “What if Buffy were to be severely injured or killed just by having an off day with a totally normal, regular vampire? Everybody makes mistakes, right?” Well, yes. Buffy is bested in a fight by a totally normal vampire in the opening scene of “Fool For Love,” prompting her on a journey of self-exploration that leads her to Spike, who knows about Slayers.  Funnily enough, no one knows more about Slayers than vampires, especially those who have killed multiple Slayers, such as Spike. He was always a layered character, but I feel his “William the Bloody” moments showed the complexities of how one changes when becoming a vampire. I believe Spike ultimately is able to act benevolently because of who he was as a human — an awkward but oh so well-meaning romantic. In “Fool For Love,” we are treated to a deconstruction of Spike the man, Spike the monster, and most interestingly and importantly, Spike the tragic hero. Spike is one of the most layered, fully developed characters in the series, and this episode is one of two reasons why.

9. “Lies My Parents Told Me” (Season 7, Episode 17) — This episode is the other reason why I love Spike so much. He’s a human in the world of vampires; he’s a vampire in the world of humans. Now, it seems harder and harder for him to prove that he really isn’t beyond redemption. However, this episode is also about Buffy’s transformation into becoming a leader. Sometimes a leader must lead by defying her advisors, including Giles (who is trying to see things the most rationally but ultimately cannot be persuaded by his own bias against Spike and his firm opinion that demons are irredeemable). Buffy must confront the idea that sometimes leaders do need to know how to break the moral boundaries when the time is right. However, the discussion of this episode is “Is this the right time?” And that idea is the basis for one of the most revealing episodes in the entire series. Giles’s sometimes-harsh “leadership” tactics are finally shown to be somewhat misguided, and it is in this episode where his mentor-mentee relationship with Buffy is finally destroyed; they are now equals.

8.  “Hush” (Season 4, Episode 10) — If I had to single out a single, incredibly valuable strength of this show, I’d have to say “dialogue, dialogue, dialogue.” Then, Buffy creator Joss Whedon comes along with a largely dialogue-free episode that is one of the most horrifying (and also one of the silliest) of the entire series. The Gentlemen are truly terrifying in its use of silence. The lyrical melody hummed by a small child in a dream sequence, reminiscent of A Nightmare on Elm Street’s famous “One, two, Freddy’s coming for you,” sets off the tone about how the loss of verbal communication can actually help Buffy and Riley cement their feelings for each other. The Gentlemen are also the perfect villains for a show like Buffy. They come from an old fairy tale and represent the demonic nature of the sins of the past: patriarchy, slavery, and more. They even steal the hearts of their victims, a reference to the destruction one person can create by metaphorically breaking someone’s heart. It’s surprising even for Buffy villains how layered these guys can be (more so considering they exist in one episode, without a single line of dialogue between them all). And the fact that Buffy is the “princess” who stops The Gentlemen by screaming is perfect. This episode, with almost no dialogue, was the only Buffy episode ever to be nominated for a writing Emmy.

7. “Innocence” (Season 2, Episode 13) — This is where Buffy stops being a silly ‘90s vampire show that happens to be laden with amazing characters and great metaphors about teenage life and becomes a truly legendary show. The pain that Angelus will cause Buffy is so clear here, and he’s only just begun. The Judge is a very good villain as well. Though he has little flair or personality (and almost no character development over the two episodes in which he appears), he has lots of thematic and symbolic meaning. His place here is mainly twofold: giving Buffy a corporeal villain to fight that poses a larger threat and is more powerful than a vampire, and reminding the audience of Angel’s soullessness. We have entered the golden age of Buffy! The title reflects the literal innocence of everyone at this time in their life (just before and after they lose their virginity), especially Buffy’s vulnerability in her deep yet very innocent love for Angel and her incapability of killing him at the end of the episode. “Dream on, schoolgirl. Your boyfriend is dead.” With that line, we enter the golden age of Buffy.

6.  “Graduation Day, Part 2” (Season 3, Episode 22) — This episode is the perfect climax of the greatest season of Buffy. Buffy learns, from Faith, about the nature of being the Slayer. This episode marks several ascensions: the students are ascending in graduating high school; the mayor is ascending into a demon; et cetera, but more important are the sacrifices that must be made to achieve ascension. The end battle is epic, with major stakes that lead to the tragic deaths of many important characters (the secretly gay football player Larry Blaisdell being one of the most heart-wrenching for me; he had one season of being allowed to be his gay self and STILL be the star footballer, and then he died. I’m crying a few tears as I write this.)

5. “Earshot” (Season 3, Episode 18) — This is maybe the most relatable episode in the entire series, one of the most strikingly real and deafeningly alarming episodes ever on television. In the post-Columbine era, this thing reminded us that maybe direct mass murder isn’t even the scariest thing in our crazy world; maybe that distinct honor goes to how humans as a group can bring specific people to their breaking point. This episode draws us in with a murder-mystery premise and some of the best dialogue in the entire season. I love it for how relevant it has stayed for almost twenty years since it was created. I love it for how well-written it is.

4. “Once More, With Feeling” (Season 6, Episode 7) — “The hardest thing in this world is to live in it.” — Dawn Summers (as written by Joss Whedon). Everything about this episode is perfect. I mean, the idea of people singing out their most deep-seated painful thoughts and secrets is perfection. Sweet is the greatest one-off villain on the entire show, and he’s even more impressive given his rather small amount of screen time. Every single scene in this episode is rich with character. Buffy feels like she is “Going Through the Motions”; for the first time in her life, she doesn’t give a damn about anything going on in the world. She is singing a Disney-like song about being very depressed and giving up hope in general. Sweet leads her on the path of admitting all of her secrets, ending with the revelation to her friends about how they took her out of a literal heaven when they brought her back from death. Tara and Giles, who never really had much in common before, are in similar roles here, trying to save a person they love from going down a very dark path. For Tara, it’s Willow with her magic, and for Giles, it’s Buffy with her post-resurrection depression and dependence on his help. Spike is also conflicted. He feels deep lust for Buffy (which later proves uncontrollable in “Seeing Red”), who won’t give him the time of day but often tortures him with her presence. These are deep, nuanced characters. The songs are all great; the depressing and non-Disney-like meaning of  “Going Through The Motions” contrasts with its natural Disneyish charm; “Standing” is an emotional, introspective soft-rock ballad about Giles’s role in Buffy’s life now that she is an adult; “Under Your Spell” is a love song that glimmers with ironic truths; “What You Feel” is a jazzy, gleeful crowd-pleaser ironic in its intent; “Rest In Peace” is a hard-rock song about the anger that can come with love; “Walk Through The Fire” is a harmonic masterpiece about characters overcoming their fears.

3. “The Body” (Season 5, Episode 16) — In the middle of a very good season of television, we suddenly have this literally musicless interruption that discusses the profound impact death can have on loved ones. This episode tackles profound emotions in every character. It is absolutely perfect in its handling of every single character’s reaction to this loss. Anya’s reaction to Joyce’s death is heartbreaking; she’s never felt anything like this before in her life. The impact of a sudden, very tough loss like Joyce’s on the lives of other people is immense, and that’s what the show captures here. It treats the brutal realities of death in all their horrible simplicity. It has no conventional Buffy-like plot; it is just the characters we have grown to love dealing with all the issues, big and small, that are brought on by death. It is realistic in a way that even few non-fantasy films and TV shows can even aspire to. I love this episode; it’s painful, real, and (sometimes) darkly comedic — just like the loss of a real loved one. And the ending, with its brutal reminder that the real, normal world is still there, waiting for Buffy’s return is heartbreaking. Buffy has to return to the real world because so many lives depend on her existence. Now it’s time to go back to the real world, holding your bleeding heart in your hands and placing it back in your chest so that you can keep going on. Wow.

2. “The Gift” (Season 5, Episode 22) — “The Gift” made me bawl. A lot. “The Gift” begins with a tragic reminder of Buffy’s past, a simple little vampire fight with almost no emotional stakes attached to it. And then she goes back inside and argues with Giles over whether he’s allowed to kill her sister. Dawn is all Buffy has left; her mother is dead; her finances are in serious trouble; her life revolves around killing soulless demons that will murder people unless she stops them. She is a necessary human sacrifice to keep the forces of evil at bay; the First Slayer said that “death is your gift” because the only thing Buffy can do to stop the endless trauma that pokes at her is die. That sucks. The moral discussion between Giles and Buffy is my favorite scene in the episode; two people, both trained to think rationally– even during the apocalypse — disagree on how far they can go to save the world. It’s about the personal versus the rational; the emotional versus the logical. It is logical to kill one person to save the rest of the world, but most of us probably couldn’t pull the trigger ourselves; we couldn’t have such a thing on our conscience, especially when that person is closely related to us. How could we kill everything we still love about ourselves in human form and stay alive in the metaphorical sense of the world?

1. “Passion” (Season 2, Episode 17) — I first saw this episode at the age of eleven, I was lying in bed while watching it. I didn’t sleep that night. This episode is witty, tragic, intense, thoughtful, philosophical, gutsy, morose, operatic, brutal, and most of all, shocking. Angel is an intense, thematically rich villain. Angel, Buffy’s former lover who has lost a soul, talks about passion. Passion is the beating heart in all of us. One could even say that passion is what makes up one’s soul — or, in Angel’s case, one’s lack of a soul. This episode is about the passions of all of the characters. Angel’s horrifying obsession with Buffy is downright painful to watch, especially because the episode is narrated by — and told from the perspective of — Angel. Buffy’s passion is her love and caring for a man she finds sympathetic — a man who lives in the dark while still having a conscience — until he loses his soul, and all hell breaks loose. She feels the need to neutralize Angel without killing him; she still believes that the man she loves is inside somehow. Giles’s passion is one of the most interesting; it ebbs and flows through the episode from passionate love for Jenny to an intense hatred for Angel. One last little side note: I’ve heard (but can’t quite confirm) that before Buffy, David Boreanaz wasn’t pursuing acting; he was apparently discovered by a friend of one of the casting directors who lived nearby and watched Boreanaz walk his dog and saw in Boreanaz everything they were looking for in Angel. If that’s true, then I must truly tip my hat to David Boreanaz. While this would explain some wooden acting early in season one, for Boreanaz to be able to do anything resembling the kind of work he does here with so little acting experience is…well, it’s breathtaking. His performance here is captivating; he embodies this cold, soulless, darkly comedic, slightly melodramatic (yet also intensely passionate) character of Angelus (Angel, when he has no soul, is sometimes referred to as Angelus) to a degree that many seasoned actors would be jealous of.

So that’s my top 10! Hope you all enjoyed this little Buffy geek-out session. And if you haven’t seen the show, just go watch it. It’s the greatest thing ever. Like, now. Like, WHAT ARE YOU STILL DOING HERE GO WATCH IT!!!!!!!

Editor: Makena Behnke

Filed Under: Advice, Culture, Fiction, Horror, Performances, Review Tagged With: Leo Milmet

The U.S Bureau of Consular Affairs

December 19, 2018 by szachik@pvs.org 2 Comments

By Luke Langlois

Today, I am going to share a resource with you. If you were to collect one million bucket lists, you would likely read of people’s desires to “travel the world” many, many times. However, the U.S Bureau of Consular Affairs, a branch of the Department of State, would most likely tell “world travelers” to hold their horses. You see, the Bureau has a little something called the Travel Advisories, the links for which can be found below. These websites gives the world’s countries a 1-4 ranking, based on how suitable a nation is for American travelers.

Level 1: Exercise Normal Precautions

Level 2: Exercise Increased Caution

Level 3: Reconsider Travel

Level 4: Do Not Travel

Let me break down these ranks. A Level 1 country is normally safe to travel to; you would just need to take the usual precautions. Level 2 countries are also usually fine places to travel. They are marked as such due to a slightly higher rate of petty street crimes or an increased risk of terrorist activities. Level 3 countries are not the ideal travel destinations. They usually are marked as having high rates of crime or increased risk of terrorist activity, which is relatively similar to a Level 2 nation. However, Level 3 countries are set apart from Level 2 due to domestic strife. For example, Haiti is marked as Level 3 due to political and civil unrest; the high rates of crime are a result of this. Traveling to Level 4 countries is an extreme risk. If you are bent on traveling to a Level 4 nation, expect resistance at every step of the way. It is important to note, though, that people are only explicitly banned from traveling to the Democratic People’s Republic of North Korea; everywhere else is “fair game.”  The Bureau, quite literally, recommends that travelers write their wills, as well as check on their life insurance, before they travel to a Level 4 country. Level 4 countries are usually rampant in crime, especially towards outsiders from the west.  Level 4 countries are, most likely, experiencing deadly domestic conflict, or are under the rule of a violent dictator. Some of the Level 4 countries are even in the midst of a civil war. There are only eleven countries with this designation. The Bureau advises those that travel to Level 4 countries to stay in certain, safer, locations within the nation. These areas tend to be densely populated regions that are somewhat under control of the local government, which makes it easier for a response in case something were to happen to the traveler. There is much more to be seen on the website itself, but this hopefully has given you a good idea of the rankings system.

I am not a traveler, but I enjoy checking the Travel Advisories every once in a while to see what is going on in the world. You see, the media does not tend to focus on domestic foreign affairs unless they’re large and publicized issues that Americans are interested in. To get an idea of what is going on in the world, you would have to really pay attention to the media, or you would have to find international outlets. While nations with stability have credible news sources, many nations do not have seriously credible sources of news.  In short, seeing the state of countries around the world is not an easy thing to do. With this resource, you can see the world at a glance. If you at all are curious, check out the Bureau’s websites below. There’s always something to learn.

https://travelmaps.state.gov/TSGMap/

A map view of the world, with rankings.

https://travel.state.gov/content/travel/en/traveladvisories/traveladvisories.html/

A list view of the world, with rankings.

Editor: Holden Hartle

Filed Under: Advice, Culture, Current News, Politics, The World, Travel Tagged With: Luke Langlois, The U.S Bureau of Consular Affairs

Do YOU want to be a Pokemon trainer?

December 14, 2018 by szachik@pvs.org Leave a Comment

By Jeremy Cheng, Pokemon Master

Before Thanksgiving, Nintendo published two new games for the Nintendo Switch called Let’s Go Pikachu! and Let’s Go Eevee! Check out the picture below.


They are both very similar games with a few small differences. Let’s talk about those differences.

Players will get either Pikachu or Eevee, depending on the version that you play.

When choosing Pikachu, we can yell, “Pikachu, I choose you!”

The Pikachu and Eevee that you get at the beginning are not going to “evolve” like most Pokemon do. But, the Pikachu and Eevee that you catch in the wild can evolve.

When using Pikachu and Eevee to enter a battle, the characters are not going to throw a Poke ball to release the Pokemon like in previous versions. Pikachu and Eevee will stand on the player character’s shoulders and jump into the battlefield.


Usually, Pikachu stands on the character’s shoulder, while Eevee sits on character’s head.

The Pikachu and Eevee you get at the beginning are called Partner Pokemon. They can learn special skills that other Pokemon are not able to learn.

In the older versions of the Pokemon games, when players want to catch Pokemon, players have to fight with the Pokemon that they want to catch and throw the Poke ball. In these two versions of the game, players only need to throw the ball. Like in Pokemon Go, there is no battle needed.


The first difference of these games is the outfits. In these games, players can buy different outfits for their partner Pokemon. The clothes that you can buy depend on the version you play.

Secondly, there are some Pokemon that only appear in one version of the game which means that players of both versions have to make Pokemon trades if they want to collect all the Pokemon. It provides a chance for players to be able to interact with other players and gives the game a community.


Players who have played Pokemon Go on the phone can transfer their Pokemon from Pokemon Go to Let’s go Pikachu or Let’s go Eevee.


There is an accessory called the Poke Ball Plus. Players can use Poke Ball Plus to walk their Pokemon in real life. Crazy!


As for me, I prefer Let’s Go Pikachu. When I was young, I imagined that I could have a Pikachu just like Ash, the famous character of the TV show who has the first generation Pikachu. This game lets me realize my childhood dream.


Editor: Luke Langlois

Filed Under: Culture, Media, Op-Ed, Review, Technology Tagged With: Jeremy Cheng, Nintendo Switch: Let's go Pikachu Reaction

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • …
  • 84
  • 85
  • 86
  • 87
  • 88
  • …
  • 128
  • Next Page »

About

We are the Palm Valley Firebirds of Rancho Mirage, California. Join us in our endeavors. Venture through the school year with us, perusing the artwork of our students, community, and staff. Our goal is to share the poems, stories, drawings and photographs, essays and parodies that come out of our school. Welcome aboard!