the bird on fire

The Bird is the Word: Sophisticated Schoolyard Shenanigans

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Powered by Genesis

What is racism?

April 15, 2016 by szachik@pvs.org 9 Comments

–by Gaven Li FullSizeRender-16

We live in an extremely sensitive world. If people don’t use words like “black” or “colored” properly, they will be easily considered “racist.” I’ve been living in the United States as a Chinese student for about seventeen months and have met or heard many things that are a little “racist” but not hard to get over. So what is racism? In my very own opinion, racism is not the jokes that my friends often make about my eyes (sometime they are actually funny), or the fact that it took some teachers a year to stop calling me “Michael,” who is another male Chinese student in my grade. I don’t think these things are racist. They won’t even hurt my feelings.

The real racism is when mainstream media keeps conveying wrong messages to the audience that China is still a poor, rural country with uneducated people, while they never show the amazing changes China has made in the past thirty years. The real racism is the stereotype of “the smart Asian” or “the calculator,” without realizing how hard Chinese students study and how competitive it is to get into a good college in China. The real racism is claiming that “Chinese immigrants are taking over our land and our jobs,” while forgetting how European immigrants took land and livelihood from Native Americans two hundred years ago. The real racism is making fun of the Chinese internet blockade while praising the “freedom of speech” which was written in the U.S. Constitution while Edward Snowden has been hiding all over the world for three years. The real racism is laughing at China’s government system without even knowing anything about it, while the U.S. election system is about to let Mr. Donald Trump become the next president. The real racism is indignantly criticizing the child labor issues in China, while ignoring which country held slaves for two centuries.

Growing up in China, we are taught that the United States of America is an amazing country with liberty and democracy—Hollywood, New York, the NBA…it sounds a wonderful place. When I first came here, however, the one question that I was asked so many times was, “Do you eat dogs?” This really shocked me. I don’t know if it’s because of TV, newspapers, or the internet; it seems like most Americans’ knowledge and understanding of China is from the 1970’s. Even though I know the United States is probably so perfect that the people don’t necessarily want to learn too much about other countries, what really upsets mIMG_0755e is the fact that so many people accept the wrong, misguided images of China or Chinese people without thinking or researching. The comic-strip caricature of the evil Fu Manchu, for example, was perpetuated by the media and politicians. I can live with all the racist jokes, but it is the disrespect and unfair judgement to my motherland that hurts me the most.

Because of cultural differences, Asian people usually don’t speak out for themselves or protest in public, but that doesn’t mean we don’t have feelings. I’m not pointing at anyone since most of my friends and teachers are nice to me and I really appreciate it. I’m just expressing how I feel about racism as portrayed in the media and internet. Indeed, Asians have small eyes, but they are big enough for us to see the unfairness and discrimination we are facing.

Filed Under: Culture, Politics, The World Tagged With: Chinese, racism

The World According to Henry: Donald “Julius?” Trump

March 18, 2016 by szachik@pvs.org Leave a Comment

IMG_1126–Henry Huang

 

I don’t want to bring politics too much into this blog since there are better things in my life than politics–like art, classical music, soccer, and Ferraris. Still, I have to talk about current affairs. More specifically, I want to talk about Donald Trump.

I am not talking about the capability of Trump being the head of the Executive Branch. My point is, Mr. Trump may be our Julius Caesar. What happened after the death of Caesar? The death of Roman Democracy! Trump may kill the most important asset of this nation: Democracy.

Now, some people may compare Trump to Berlusconi, the former Italian prime minister. They are both rich; both use the anger of the people to gain power. However, they are also different. Berlusconi is a playboy who held sexual parties in his house; I don’t think Trump will do that. Meanwhile, Berlusconi did not make any outrageous statement towards any group or religion. Trump, oh well, do I need to tell you what he said?unnamed-1

Now, the real issue, Why may Trump kill our democracy? First of all, he has a potential desire to ignore the Constitution. An obvious example of this is when Trump, last August, made the statement that he will deport all the Mexican illegal immigrants and their natural-born children. He indeed intended to violate the 14th Amendment of the Constitution. The amendment grants citizenship to the natural born. When Trump claims to send them back, it is an obvious potential violation of the Constitution. Now, people may say that there are Supreme Court justices and members of Congress that can stop Trump. Nope, I am sorry, nope. As Martin Wolf of Financial Times writes,  “It is rash to assume constitutional constraints would survive the presidency of someone elected because he neither understands nor believes in [those constitutional restraints].” If Trump has an ability to violate the 14th Amendment, he will also have the ability to violate the entire constitution!

People who voted for Donald Trump support his ideas. For example, polls suggest there are voters who support deporting Muslims: “In New Hampshire, 66 percent approved of it. Seventy-eight percent of Republican primary voters in Alabama and Arkansas gave it a thumbs-up” (Foreign Policy). When Trump gets elected, what he will control is not only regular government agencies; he will have the most powerful military in human history in his hand and the most effective law enforcement and intelligence agencies in the world. Yes, I am talking about the CIA, the FBI, and the IRS. Trump will have the capability to enforce his doctrine. The point is, there are 11 million people who are illegal immigrants in the United States. Deporting all of them is a dangerous move. Martin Wolf of Financial Times continues, “Rounding up and deporting 11 million people is an immense coercive enterprise. Would a president elected to achieve this be prevented and, if so, by whom? What are we to make of Mr Trump’s enthusiasm for the barbarities of torture? Would he find people willing to carry out his desires or not?” Trump has other behaviors that should raise public concern. According to an article from Variety, “Criticizing The New York Times for its coverage, Trump said, ‘We are going [to open] up libel laws, folks, and we are going to have people sue you like you have never been sued before.’” Trump will limit the freedom of speech.

unnamedI want to end this article with another quote from Financial Times: Chief Commentator Martin Wolf concludes, “Mr. Trump may still fail to win the Republican nomination. But, should he do so the Republican elite will have to ask themselves hard questions — not only how this happened, but how they should properly respond. Beyond that, the American people will have to decide what sort of human being they want to put in the White House. The implications for them and for the world of this choice will be profound. Above all, Mr. Trump may not prove unique. An American ‘Caesarism’ has now become flesh. It seems a worryingly real danger today.” The potential danger, the seeming ignorance, the outrageous narcism of this new Caesar may be the nails in the coffin for American democracy.

Filed Under: Politics Tagged With: Caesar, Donald Trump, Financial Times, Martin Wolf

How Should America Respond . . . to Gun Control?

January 20, 2016 by szachik@pvs.org 4 Comments

unnamed

–by Chloe Sweeney, as part of her ongoing series, “How Should America Respond . . . ?”

 

The opinions expressed in this piece do not necessarily reflect the views of my fellow blog constituents or the Palm Valley School. — C.S.

On December 2nd, the United States was horrified as it witnessed another massacre carried out by fanatics. This tragedy occurred in San Bernardino, California, a mere hour from my home. The aftermath of the crisis came with the leftist rhetoric calling for increased gun control. These shouts for more firearm regulations have become standard after mass shootings.
IMG_1323The Second Amendment of the United States Constitution clearly articulates Americans’ rights to bear arms. If something is so clearly stated, why are there so many people who wish to infringe upon this right? Already, there are many laws in place that restrict the owning, selling, and usage of guns. For example, it is almost impossible to obtain a Concealed Weapons License in New York City, and California has many laws regulating the type of guns that you may own and the number of rounds you can keep in the gun’s magazine. Despite these laws, there are over 33,600 gun-related deaths annually in the US. Some are quick to point the finger at the NRA, and they say the problem is that there are too many guns. I completely disagree. The problem is that law-abiding citizens are restricted from carrying guns so guns fall in the hands of criminals.
Civilians in France are unable to carry firearms, and we saw what happened in Paris last month. I believe that if more law-abiding citizens were carrying firearms the scope of the tragedy would have been drastically decreased. The case is the same for San Bernardino. The California shooting took place in a gun-free zone. The shooters knew they would be unopposed by any of those attending the holiday party, so they seized the opportunity to slaughter them. Since 2009, 92% of mass shootings have occurred in gun-free zones. Many establishments–including schools, movie theaters, etc.–are gun free. This makes people sitting ducks. We saw this in the Tennessee military recruiting office where even the soldiers were unable to carry guns. We also saw this at Sandy Hook and the Batman theater attack. There is a reason why terrorists and other shooters go to such locations. They know they will be unopposed. These radical, disturbed people want to encounter unarmed citizens. If we give in to the people who want to decrease gun posseIMG_1325ssion, then we will continue to see the death toll rise due to mass shootings.
In my opinion, almost all gun laws are completely pointless. Laws such as what guns you can own, how many bullets you keep in the gun, and where you can carry guns are only followed by law-abiding citizens who DON’T want to kill people. A terrorist will use a machine gun whether or not they are legal. It honestly makes no
difference whether or not these laws exist. The laws are simply in place to give people a false sense of security. If a fanatic wants to carry out a mass shooting, they will do so regardless of laws. When someone has made up his or her mind to do something, no law will stand in opposition.
With gun laws, I believe the most important thing is to use common sense. People should be required to have a background check before purchasing a gun. You shouldn’t be able to buy a gun until you are over 18 without a parent/guardian present. If you are on the no-fly list you CANNOT be allowed to buy a gun. If you are on the terrorist-watch list you shouldn’t be able to buy a gun. If you are not a naturalized American citizen you shouldn’t be able to buy a gun. Specifically anyone in America on a visa, especially from countries with a large terrorist presence, cannot be allowed to purchase a gun.
Many people feel like you should only be allowed to own hunting guns, but I completely disagree.
A free people ought not only be armed and disciplined, but they should have sufficient arms and ammunition to maintain a status ofIMG_1321 independence from any who might attempt to abuse them, which would include their own government. –George Washington
I am not saying that we need to be armed to overthrow the government, but I believe this quote explains why Americans have the right to carry guns. The Founding Fathers did not write the 2nd Amendment so that we could go hunting, which is still a very important part of it, but the law was written so that Americans could protect themselves. The American people must be able to stand up against evil and radical terrorists who threaten their lives and the lives’ of their children. It can take minutes for law enforcement to reach the scene of a mass shooting, but if terrorists find themselves attacking a crowd of armed citizens, many innocent lives will be spared.
I believe that Americans need to be able to carry concealed weapons in each and every state without any restrictive zones. Let me remind you that in order to obtain a Concealed Weapons License, you need to be thoroughly vetted and go through gun-safety training. Law-abiding citizens should be able to purchase legally and own whatever type of gun they please. For guns such as assault rifles and machine guns, I believe prospective buyers should go through a brief safety training and should also go through a mental health evaluation. This is because the vast majority of mass shooters are young men who have fallen susceptible to radicalization or are extremely mentally unstable. I do not believe that all teachers should be forced to carry guns on campus, but I do believe there needs to be an adequate number of armed guards depending on the size of the campus and the number of students. I wish that this could mean that we will all be safe, but unfortunately we live in a world with evil people who desire the slaughter of innocents.

unnamed-1

Filed Under: Culture, Politics

We Lift Our Lamp Beside the Golden Door

January 13, 2016 by szachik@pvs.org Leave a Comment

  As we continue to wrestle with terrorist attacks, the threat of terrorist attacks, refugees in desperate need of help and sanctuary, Bloggers Anna Kleckerova and Trey Lucatero wrestle with handling the turmoil humanely, responsibly, with fear and with courage.

This piece does not necessarily reflect the views of Palm Valley School or our fellow bloggers.–Anna Kleckerova and Trey Lucatero

IMG_0504
Friday, November 13th, 2015 marks the most devastating day in French history within the last several decades. The first attack on Paris began just after 9:20 pm UTC. Several armed men began roaming the streets of Paris, opening fire on clubs, diners, and crowds of innocent people. They were calm and steadfast in their resolve. President Francois Hollande called the attacks an “act of war” by the Islamic State (The Washington Post). Radical cutthroats cowardly kill civilians from all over the IMG_0505world. They slaughter anyone who does not conform to their ideas. They kill those who stand in the way of their ideology. These terrorists wish to instill immense fear in the hearts of everyone. And, they’re succeeding. These men, women, and children who are stuck between the crossfire are forced to seek refuge in safer lands. Europe is currently overflowing with refugees from Syria, unable to support so many who cannot support themselves. Up to this point, America has done nothing in regards to helping the refugees escape their war-stricken home. The refugees want to come to a place where they can be safe and successful, without having to fear for their childrens’ lives. They have to travel thousands of kilometers every day for a chance at a better life. America should intervene and alleviate some of Europe’s weighty responsibility to the refugees. We cannot send these refugees back to their hell. It is our duty as humans to help them. Not every Muslim is a terrorist. That’s a fact we should all realize.
America and Europe have to stay strong together during this crisis. They can easily help each other to coordinate relief efforts to save these refugees. It is extremely important for Americans to take some of the refugees. If they don’t do so, the terrible consequences will be felt by both Europeans and Americans, and many others throughout the world.
Recently, several governors of various states have proclaimed that they will not, under any circumstances, accept Syrian refugees. They believe that allowing any refugees into our country will result in spontaneous terrorist attacks on our soil. People are afraid, and rightfully so. Yet, does our cowardice run so deep that we will turn down accepting innocent men, women, and children into our country? Closing our borders is exactly what the radical terrorists want. They want us, the once great and mighty America, to cower in fear of Islam, and we’re letting them do exactly that.
Closing our borders to these people would be against everything America stands for.

“Give me your tired, your poor, your huddled masses yearning to breathe free, the wretched refuse of your teeming shore.  Send these, the homeless, tempest-tost to me, I lift my lamp beside the golden door!”
The New Colossus — Emma Lazarus

These words are etched in stone on the Statue of Liberty. If we were to inhumanly deny these lost souls, we would be disgracing our legacy and dishonoring every value and ideal set forth by our founding fathers. We do not consider this as an acceptable thing to do. This is why we believe America must accept Syrian refugees.

–Edited by Chloe Sweeney

IMG_0506

Filed Under: Culture, Politics Tagged With: America, courage, cowardice, Czech, Emma Lazarus, Europe, Islamic State, lamp, liberty, refugees, World Affairs

The Art of Talking

December 17, 2015 by szachik@pvs.org Leave a Comment

As you prepare to sit around the holiday table with relatives and close friends, Ashley Zhou, specialist in relationships, has some conversational advice for you . . . .

IMG_2335

–by Ashley Zhou

 

“We always take good care of our appearance, our clothing, and makeup. We look into the mirror several times a day, but we don’t listen to our own voices when we are talking.” — Kevin Tsai 

This is an excerpt from a famous Chinese book, The Art Of Talking by Chinese writer and TV host, Kevin Tsai. I think of this book when I hear my peers talk, chat, or argue about different topics. We really don’t care much about the way we talk to others. No one will actually tape his own voice and play it back at the end of the day. I once listened to my voice when I was doing a interview, and I felt really uncomfortable about my voice. I didn’t think the voice sounded like me. However, we can think in a different way: If we constantly listen to ourselves or pay attention to our voice volume and tone when we are talking, we will become better talkers.IMG_2354

When we are talking, we all want to be the dominator in the conversation. We always want to talk about ourselves. To be a good friend, however, we need to listen carefully to others. Try to avoid saying “I” in the conversation, instead, use “you” or “he.” Also, if you don’t want to be too blunt in front of newly made friends, then you should avoid those sensitive or potentially dangerous topics, such as age, relationships, politics, religion, etc. Some people have secrets that they don’t want to reveal, and others might have strong opinions about a certain issue that might cause arguments.

People want to hear compliments the most. We need to intentionally compliment our friends and make them feel special. Being a good friend doesn’t mean being honest or blunt. It means to place yourself in your friend’s shoes. Be empathetic. When we are asking someone for a favor, it is the same thing. We could use a little trick to achieve whatever we want. For example, when you want someone to cover for you at work, you may want to say, “Could you help me this time and I will substitute for you next month?”

Talking is an art, and it needs us to be studied and explored and practiced. A person who knows how to talk will be much more attractive than someone who knows how to dress.

 

–Edited by Gaven Li

Filed Under: Culture, Food, Interview, Letters, Politics Tagged With: art of, conversation, empathy, talking, Tsai

How Should America Respond . . . to Syrian Refugees?

December 3, 2015 by szachik@pvs.org 15 Comments

CHLOE’S CORNER

–by Chloe Sweeney

FullSizeRender-5

The question on the world’s mind is, “How should we respond to the Syrian refugee crisis?” In this piece, I will be presenting my personal opinion on how I believe America should respond. This does not necessarily reflect the views of Palm Valley School or my fellow blog constituents. 

Recently thirty-one United States governors released statements on their refusal to accept Syrian refugees in light of the recent Paris attacks. These governors are from Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Mississippi, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, and Wisconsin. This has been matched with only seven US governors stating their willingness to accept Syrian refugees. These are governors from Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Pennsylvania, Vermont, and Washington. This issue has gone far beyond party lines. Despite this outcry from the states, the decision on whether or not to accept refugees lies with the federal government. President Barrack Obama has so far remained firm that the US will accept 10,000 Syrian refugees. The states can make the executive branch’s task a lot more difficult by refusing to cooperate with the President or defunding programs that pay for refugee resettlement. A bill recently passed in the House of Representatives to halt the President’s refugee plan until a secure vetting system is put in place.

The President has vowed to veto this bill but thankfully the House has enough votes to reverse such a veto.

image1
People seem to feel like we either need to allow Syrian refugees to enter our country, or we need to leave them alone in the cold. I don’t believe the situation is that simple. I feel very strongly that Syrian refugees, regardless of their faith, should not be allowed to enter my country. I believe that security is a fundamental right that Americans are entitled to. I want to feel safe going to school, sporting events, and church. I understand that the VAST majority of Syrian refugees are not radical Muslims, but we have absolutely no way to discern who these people really are. With Syria’s loss of infrastructure, there are no background checks or ways to confirm the validity of these people’s identities. Two weeks ago, five men were detained in Honduras for possessing fake Syrian passports. Experts have reason to believe that these men wanted to reach the United States to carry out jihadist attacks. One of the Paris attackers, as reported by CNN, is believed by experts to have disguised himself as a refugee who entered Europe from Greece, travelled to Belgium, and then on to Paris to help carry out the massacre. My opinion before, during, and after the Paris attacks has remained firm that Syrian refugees cannot be allowed to come to the United States. The risk of American lives is far too great. There are too many cracks in the vetting system for radical Islamic terrorists to slip through. There is absolutely no way to ensure the safety of all American citizens. The President’s number one job is to protect his nation, and it is not possible for Barrack Obama to fulfill his duty if we allow Syrian refugees to come to America. I implore President Obama to reconsider his resettlement plan.
I do believe that we have a responsibility to help the Syrian people. I think there are many different avenues on how to do this, besides letting them enter America. What I propose is creating a no-fly or safe zone in Syria and Iraq for refugees. There the US and other countries can provide humanitarian aid such as food, water, shelter, and health care. As fellow humans, we have an obligation to do our part to help these people. Ultimately, once they have been given the resources, we will need the Syrian people to restore stability and rebuild their own country. Once the civil war is over and ISIS is eliminated, the Syrian people must be responsible for their own country.
The terror group, ISIS, already causes me fear. The idea that they could reach me at home is absolutely horrifying. They threaten my life, my family’s lives, my freedom, and my faith. ISIS already has the means through social media, lone-wolf attackers, and the recruiting/radicalization of Americans to stage attacks in the United States. As we have seen with the 2013 Boston Marathon bombings and 9/11, we are well within the grasp of radical Islam. We must eliminate the possibility of terrorists infiltrating our homeland. For these reasons, I ask that Syrian refugees not be allowed to enter America.

Filed Under: Letters, Politics, The World Tagged With: Syrian Refugees

Immigration Wave in Europe

October 9, 2015 by szachik@pvs.org 2 Comments

image2 –by Anna Kleckerova, European Correspondent

The situation with immigrants is getting worse with every day. These people are coming from Syria, Iraq, and Afghanistan, filling up all European countries. Many of them went to Greece first. They want to get to Germany, Austria and Great Britain because the economies are good and the migrants often speak the languages, but they are not always accepted. Germany is accepting many of them. The Germans are really trying to help them and show the whole world that they are a better country than what many remember from their past. Immigrants with valid ID cards have the greatest chance of getting accepted. Other countries usually don’t have much mercy for the immigrants and send them back to the country from which they came.

I want to show you how brutal ISIS is to get you to better understand how important it is to help the migrants. A life in Syria is horrible. ISIS totally took control of everything there. They are an extreme sect of Islam. News organizations report members of ISIS murder, arrest, rape, enslave, and terrorize people who believe in another religion or don’t keep to their rules, often using the Quran as justification.

Rashid Khalidi, a professor of modern Arab studies at Columbia University, disputes that the Quran offers any justification for [things such as] beheading. He cites the lines coming immediately after one of the two verses used to justify the act: “Therefore, when you meet the unbelievers, smite at their necks.” But the very next line, contained in Chapter 47, Verse 4: “At length, when ye have thoroughly subdued them, bind the captives firmly. Therefore is the time for either generosity or ransom.”

So basically, Khalidi said, there’s nothing about this passage that justifies the cutting off of heads.

“It just shows that they don’t know anything about Islam and they probably don’t know how to read this properly,” he said.—PBS NEWSHOUR

ISIS has been taking prisoners (soldiers, journalists) and cutting their heimage1ads off while they were recording the whole process. The Czech News reports many young Syrian men are coming to ISIS because it is an easy way to get women as slaves, and their violence is constantly increasing.
The European Union is trying to solve this huge problem. Countries that are members of this Union had a meeting in Brussels and were talking about this immigration crisis. Their final verdict was that European countries have to split 120,000 immigrants between each other. All European countries now must support the vote in Brussels. One of the theories is to provide an island for this mass of people and send them there. But Europe has to start doing something with this or it will have a horrible impact on the whole continent, and America should help, too, because Europe will never be able to accept so many new people who are coming there every single day.

 

*Anna Kleckerova was born and raised in the Czech Republic, most recently coming to us from Prague. She is now a senior at PVS.

Filed Under: Politics, The World Tagged With: Europe, help, immigrants, migrants

Answer the Question!

September 17, 2015 by szachik@pvs.org 2 Comments

IMG_1202

by Chloe Sweeney

Politicians tend to evade direct questions and instead hit their primary talking points–over and over. This was evident in last night’s Republican GOP Primary Debate.

Donald Trump, a billionaire real-estate mogul, was asked how he would handle Russia’s and Putin’s support of Bashar Hafez al-Assad in Syria. In his answer, . . . .

IMG_1197He said,  he would get along quite well with Vladmir Putin.

 

 

Chris Christie, Governor of New Jersey, was asked if it was worth shutting down the federal government in the effort to defund Planned Parenthood. . . .

New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie speaks during a news conference Thursday, Jan. 9, 2014, at the Statehouse in Trenton, N.J. Christie has fired a top aide who engineered political payback against a town mayor, saying she lied. Deputy Chief of Staff Bridget Anne Kelly is the latest casualty in a widening scandal that threatens to upend Christie's second term and likely run for president in 2016. Documents show she arranged traffic jams to punish the mayor, who didn't endorse Christie for re-election. (AP Photo/Mel Evans)He answered with, we need to put tax reform bills on President Obama’s desk.

 

 

Scott Walker, Governor of Wisconsin, was asked his opinion on raising the federal minimum wage. . . .

Mr. Walker responded with, we need to improve education.WASHINGTON, DC - MARCH 16: Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker speaks at the 2013 Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) March 16, 2013 in National Harbor, Maryland. The American Conservative Union held its annual conference in the suburb of Washington, DC to rally conservatives and generate ideas. (Photo by Pete Marovich/Getty Images)

 

 

 

John Kasich, Governor of Ohio, was asked why he chooses not to verbally attack Democratic frontrunner, Hillary Clinton. . . .

IMG_1200He went off  on his qualifications for the presidency.

 

 

 

 

What did you think of the debate? Leave a “direct” reply below.

Filed Under: Politics Tagged With: Evading the Question, GOP, The Debate

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4

About

We are the Palm Valley Firebirds of Rancho Mirage, California. Join us in our endeavors. Venture through the school year with us, perusing the artwork of our students, community, and staff. Our goal is to share the poems, stories, drawings and photographs, essays and parodies that come out of our school. Welcome aboard!