the bird on fire

The Bird is the Word: Sophisticated Schoolyard Shenanigans

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Powered by Genesis

The Word According to Henry (and Samuel Johnson)

April 1, 2016 by szachik@pvs.org 3 Comments

IMG_1126–by senior Blog Correspondent Henry Huang

Samuel Johnson, a genius of the English language, wrote the classic A Dictionary of the English Language in 1755. This widely-praised, linguistic-shifting, perhaps antiquated, dictionary has some very funny definitions. It is one of the earliest and most important English dictionaries. Here are some witty, amusing entries:

 

Oats. n.s. [aten, Saxon.] A grain, which in England is generally given to horses, but in Scotland supports the people. (Samuel Johnson was NOT a fan of the Scottish.)
Sonnet. n.s. [sonnet, French; sonnetto, Italian.] A short poem consisting of fourteen lines, of which the rhymes are adjusted by a particular rule. It is not very suitable to the English language, and has not been used by any man of eminence since Milton.
Lexicógrapher. n.s. [λεξικὸν and γράφω; lexicographe, French.] A writer of dictionaries; a harmless drudge, that busies himself in tracing the original, and detailing the signification of words.
Patron. n.s. [patron, Fr. patronus, Latin.] One who countenances, supports or protects. Commonly a wretch who supports with insolence, and is paid with flattery.

 

Reading these witticisms inspires me to write some of my own dictionary definitions:

A Dictionary of the English Language According to Henry:
Political Science: A study of politics, a study considered to be a modern-day dragon-killing skill

Life: A process from toothless to toothless.

Football (American): A sport that doesn’t necessarily need feet to play

Americans: A group of people who live in the United States. Sometimes a group considered annoying, loud, arrogant, and monolingual!

 

What contemporary English words would you like to RE-define?

Filed Under: Culture, Letters Tagged With: dictionary, English, re-define, Samuel Johnson

The World According to Henry: A Guide to Book Burning

December 9, 2015 by szachik@pvs.org 4 Comments

Book-Burning-Day-After-Tomorrow

–by Henry Huang

Suppose someday you and your friends end up in a situation like the one in the movie The Day After Tomorrow where you’re trapped in a library while a blizzard rages outside. In order to survive, you have to burn books to keep warm. Now the question, which books would you burn?
Remember, you are trapped in a library–an institution intended to store knowledge. You can’t burn books that will influence the survival and advancement of human beings. So, forget the calculus books, agricultural pieces, and books of essential scientific discovery. They are so important that it is not worth burning them to save individual life.
So what should you burn?
I suggest your first category for burning be . . . Celebrity Biography. 0Don’t get me wrong; some biographies are good. However, some biographies like Kim Kardashian’s Selfish, which contains nothing but her selfies, should be burned. Mostly, a biography exists because it can inspire people. However, Celebrity Biographies often offer very little under the cover. Do we really need selfies of Kim Kardashian? Remember, in our hypothetical situation, we are in a severe winter snowstorm, and we need to warm ourselves to fend off freezing. Those Celebrity Biographies are usually heavy (in weight), usually more than three hundred pages. Just one burning copy could keep us warm for hours.
Next, burn anything about the zodiac.unnamed I know many people believe in the zodiac and fortune telling. However, think about it seriously. We are now in a huge huge crisis that involves the existence of human beings in a snowstorm. At this moment, all kinds of zodiac and fortune-telling things would not work anymore. The only thing that we need to focus on, at this moment, is survival. If you’re about to freeze to death, do you really need your fortune told?
These are two kinds of books that I would like to burn in this scenario. What is your choice of books for burning in a life-threatening snowstorm?

 

Henry floated a survey on “What Book What You Burn” on Facebook. Here are some of the replies . . . .

Many of the respondents believe that the first choice of books for burning should be the Twilight series. twilightThe reasons were mostly concentrated on the fact that Twilight is a poorly written book. According to one respondent, “Twilight promotes abusive relationships and is just bad literature in general.” The second most popular choice involves encyclopedias and dictionaries. The reasons are, “They have the most paper, so they have the most fuel”; “They are very big and fairly replaceable.” Surprisingly, the third most popular choice for burning for warmth and survival is the Bible. The reasons include more are available “in the future” and “the Bible is thick and burnable.” And, one of Henry’s personal favorite responses is “Burn Mein Kampf.”

 

Filed Under: Culture, Humor, Letters, The World Tagged With: anarchy, Bible, blizzard, book, dictionary, fire, library, Mein Kampf, The Day After Tomorrow

About

We are the Palm Valley Firebirds of Rancho Mirage, California. Join us in our endeavors. Venture through the school year with us, perusing the artwork of our students, community, and staff. Our goal is to share the poems, stories, drawings and photographs, essays and parodies that come out of our school. Welcome aboard!