the bird on fire

The Palm Valley School Student Blog

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Powered by Genesis

A Modest Proposal for Gun Control

March 10, 2016 by szachik@pvs.org 3 Comments

–by Gaven “Jonathan Swift” Li, world-class blogger and student of rhetoric in Ms. Clark’s AP English Language and Composition class. Be forewarned: this article contains heavy doses of Satire.

IMG_0625

On December 2nd, 2015, a married couple walked into a banquet room in San Bernardino with guns and turned a holiday party into a massacre. Fourteen innocent people were killed in this terrorist attack. We have seen mass shootings like this happen again and again in America: Newtown, Connecticut; Roseburg, Oregon; and, now, San Bernardino, California. This must-solve problem has always been my concern. After years of watching the fascinating Democratic and Republican debates about gun control as well as doing research, I have come up with a perfect plan to deal with this controversial situation and to save the future of the United States of America.
Here’s my suggestion: In order to keep all safe, everyone in the United States must have at least one gun and there should be no gun restriction at all. Age limitation and license requirements should also be eliminated. No matter who you are, a two-year-old baby, or a ninety-year-old lady, you must own a gun. According to one of my friends, who is a huge gangster movie fan and dropped out of school in fourth grade, this is a dangerous world, or a dangerous country–you might get shot anytime, anywhere; therefore, we must have guns to prevent us from getting killed. “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” This Second Amendment of the Constitution is my friend’s favorite quote. When the great Founding Fathers of America wrote the Constitution back in 1789, they must have predicted that weapons would be so powerful and destructive after two hundred and seven years. I’m sure they took into consideration automatic weapons. We live in a much more hostile society now. Although we don’t have any wild animals trying to attack us or any war with Indian tribes, we still need to be aware of, for example, crazy dogs running around on the street biting people or some scary cops carrying weapons on their belts. We need to be armed.
Furthermore, since it is so important to be armed, gun-shooting classes should be added to the United States education system. Children are the future of the country, and they need to learn everything about guns. Pistol assembling should be required for lower school kids to graduate, while 100-yard shooting is significantly necessary for high-school students to get into colleges. We have faith in our teenagers that they are all good citizens and won’t do anything to harm their neighbors or shoot anyone they don’t like.
Now, it’s time to return to my subject. I believe that my proposal will definitely bring a lot of benefits to this country.
Firstly, it would make America an extremely powerful country. Foreigners soon will realize that they can not mess with Americans any more, and foreigners will be scared to death to even step on this land. We no longer need to worry about too many immigrants coming here, which solves the other problem we are facing–immigration.
Secondly, guns protect the safety of Americans. Imagine walking on the street at night and there’s a creepy guy walking behind you; you can just pull out your gun and send him to Jesus. If you are not fast enough to kill him before he shoots you, it’s okay, at least you can die like a hero.
Thirdly, being armed makes everything much easier. There’s no need for police since everyone has weapons to solve his or her problems. Having a religious argument? Pull out your gun! Getting bullied at school? Pull out your gun! Somebody being racist? Pull out your gun! That’s also why gun-handling instruction in education is so important.
Fourthly, arming Americans will create more job opportunities. More bodyguards will be needed when rich CEOs or controversial politicians, Donald Trump for example, show up in public. They’ll need bodyguards to build a solid wall so they won’t get shot easily.
Fifthly, the crime rate is going to decrease after applying this new law. Criminals know that a small pistol can not scare anyone anymore, and they will just give up because it may be too hard for them to get more powerful weapons. American citizenship is so great that I believe they will not do anything with guns just for their own desire. Arm the good people of America with guns.
Sixthly, the sale of guns is good for the American economy. More factories will be built in order to make more guns, and more gun shops will be opened, too. Within a few years, the United States will be selling more guns than Russia!
This is my modest proposal about guns, and hopefully it works. If it doesn’t, well, I can still escape back to my motherland China before it’s too late.

Filed Under: Uncategorized

Iago: A Genius of Manipulation

March 9, 2016 by szachik@pvs.org Leave a Comment

 IMG_1701The AP Literature class of Palm Valley has recently finished reading a classic Shakespearean play–Othello. As the instructor of the class, Mr. Griffin shares with us this incisive essay written by our outstanding senior, Amber Zheng, in which she talks about the play’s main villain–Iago–as being a genius of manipulation.

–Edited by Ashley Zhou

In William Shakespeare’s Othello, Iago is the villain who plots the entire evil plan that ultimately causes the death of Emilia, Othello, Desdemona and Roderigo. Iago is a person who only cares about himself, is extremely confident about himself, and is good at using other people’s weaknesses.

Iago is a perfect example of a self-centered person. He does everything in order to gain himself advantages. This characteristic is shown in the beginning of the playIMG_2517 when he says to Roderigo, “In following him [Othello], I follow but myself” (1.1.64). Iago follows Othello because he wants higher positions and more power, rather than to be a loyal officer of Othello. When he admits, “I am not what I am” (1.1.70), not only does he mean that he is not this seemingly good honest person that Othello believes him to be, but also that he is not the person who seems to care about others; he implies that what he truly cares about is only himself.

Iago’s self-centered trait is revealed more frequently as the play goes on. After Roderigo says that he wants to drown himself because Desdemona and Othello are married, Iago says, “I never found man that knew how to love himself” (1.3.355-356). From this sentence, we can see that Iago thinks every man around him doesn’t know how to treat himself properly, because they all care for others. In Iago’s view, Othello loves Desdemona to the point that he is willing to “renounce his baptism” (2.3.363) for her; Roderigo is ready to kill himself because of his ”loss” of Desdemona; and Cassio lets Desdemona’s beauty appear in his mind every day. From Iago’s perspective, all these behaviors are absurd, as men should only care about themselves, as he does.

That’s also why Iago says to Roderigo, “Ere . . . I would drown myself for the love of a guinea hen (he means Desdemona!), I would change my humanity with a baboon” (1.3.356-358). While Iago says this to manipulate Roderigo into following his bidding, his words actually express his true feelings: men who are willing to sacrifice themselves for others are stupid, and these people are indeed no better than baboons, certainly not supposedly smart human beings. As Iago tries to persuade Roderigo to abandon the suicide idea, he also tries to get himself as many benefits as possible by telling Roderigo to sell lands and get cash. When he succeeds, he reveals his motivation: “Thus do I ever make my fool my purse” (1.3.383). Again, Iago never does anything without the intention of getting himself advantages.

Being a self-centered person, Iago is also confident and good at using others’ weaknesses. Iago knows the difference between appearance and reality very well and establishes a plan based on his knowledge. He is confident about the success of his plan because “The Moor is of a free and open nature/ That thinks men honest that but seem to be so” (1.3.443-444). And, Desdemona is just as gullible, “framed as fruitful/ As the free elements” (2.3.361-362). Because he knows all the other characters so well, he is able to conduct his evil plan by exploiting their weaknesses. Also, because his perceptions are in fact correct, his confidence never disappoints him: everything always goes as he plans. When he says that he is a Satan – “When devils will the blackest sins put on,/ They do suggest at first with heavenly shows,/ As I do now” (2.3.371-373) – he shows his talent – indeed, his genius – for manipulating others.

Filed Under: Uncategorized

Are the Robots Taking Our Jobs?!

March 3, 2016 by szachik@pvs.org 8 Comments

 –by Jordan King, a new voice in the blogosphere–here’s his take on “the real world”

 

In the near future, we will surely see more technology and even more automation.  Functional self-driving cars are already here; they’ve been around since 2008.  There are robots that perform factory work; there are robots that replicate white-collar work; and there are even robots that write music!  What’s going to happen to jobs? Will robots take them all?

For now, we don’t really need to worry; current robots can only do basic factory work and repetitive computer work. Currently, there is a robot called Baxter; he’s a multipurpose robot that can pour drinks, fold clothes, cook food and perform many other simple tasks.  Baxter learns by humans physically moving his arms and showing him what to do. He can be programmed to perform multiple and varied tasks.

Here is a video of Baxter Brewing coffee.

 

As you may have noticed, Baxter is extremely slow; a human is about 10 times faster.  Baxter can work all day without human supervision as long as he’s doing repetitive tasks.  For now, Baxter is probably not a threat to people’s jobs.  Although in the next few decades Baxters and other multipurpose robots will definitely be much faster and able to do more complicated tasks.          

In the near future, the first people to lose jobs likely will lose them to self-driving cars.  We’ve already had functioning self-driving cars for eight years.  Uber is already planning on having self-driving cars enter the workforce in a decade from now.  In 20 years from now, most if not all of Uber’s workers will no longer be working for them. There’s also self-driving trucks, which some believe will enter the workforce in less than 10 years!  According to alltrucking.com, there are currently 3.5 million truck drivers employed in the US. Transportation is one of the most likely sectors of jobs to be replaced by automation.
The United States Department of Transportation says 16 percent of all US jobs are in the Transportation sector.

Here is a list of 12 jobs most likely to be replaced by robots according to Oxford University data.

unnamed-1

 

 Another study states that 47% of jobs are at a high risk of being replaced by robots.  So how can we deal with this?  What will potentially half the population do if they don’t have a job?  According to Forbes, robots will be the biggest job creators in history.  Is this true, though?  I say, it probably is.  Just look at historical unemployment rates.

unnamed(United States Bureau of Labor Statistics)

Unemployment rates have relatively stayed the same despite recession, economic growth, and economic turmoil, so robots won’t make a difference.  Even though there have been jobs outsourced0806-Took-Jerbs to China, India, Latin America and most factory work is replaced by machines, the unemployment rate, historically, stays relatively the same.

With the onslaught of robots, unemployment rates will rise initially as they have during other periods of economic turmoil. But, after all the steam blows over, unemployment rates will return back to normal like they have throughout US history.  

So… robots probably won’t take our jobs.

 

 

 

Filed Under: Science, The World Tagged With: Baxter, jobs, robots

Is Einstein a Buddha?

February 26, 2016 by szachik@pvs.org Leave a Comment

–by Ashley Zhou, blogger interested in religion and science

 

IMG_2461-2

Recently, Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory (LIGO)–a joint collaboration between scientists at MIT, CalTech, and many other colleges and universities–detected the existence of gravitational waves caused by the collision of two black holes. The collision produces a tremendous amount of energy and sends the ripples through the space-time fabric of the universe. Gravitational waves are those ripples. This discovery proved Albert Einstein’s prediction found in his general relativity theory of 1916.

So what does this have to do with Buddhism????

IMG_2457Well, there is some background information that’s good to know.
Max Planck, a German scientist who won the Noble Prize ( he and Albert Einstein were contemporaries), suggested an interesting idea in his later years that all matter exists in a form of energy waves. Particles that move relatively slowly form solid substances which human eyes can see. Those that move a little bit faster become fluids–such as our thoughts and feelings. The ones that move really fast become dark mass–which makes up more than 90% of our universe. Human eyes can only detect the 4% of ordinary mass. So, we basically live in a world that is dominated by dark things we don’t know. Buddhism accepts the main theory of Taoism–which is that the essence of universe is a flow of energy. Tao is the flow of energy. (Sometimes when we watch kung-fu movies, the main character will just punch and hurt people from a distance across the air. It is also a kind of energy.) There’s an interesting theory that some of the great scientists are buddhas who went beyond the scientific field of their research. Einstein landed on his Theory of Relativity maybe because he was not only a great scientist but a great buddha.
The collision of two black holes is, according to Taoism, a collision of the Yin and Yang. They collide and generate power which we see as gravitational waves.

Of course, this is just an interesting theory (the application of Buddhist principles) based on the information that I have learned regarding Taoism. The discovery of gravitational waves opens up a new way of exploring the universe for us, and we hope that someday we will find out the truth of this mysterious space–scientifically and philosophically.

Filed Under: Science Tagged With: Buddha, Einstein, Gravitational Waves

Liberty and Justice for All

February 25, 2016 by szachik@pvs.org Leave a Comment

Congratulations to senior Henry Huang and sophomore Peter Kadel. Both competed in the local Palm Springs Lions Club Speech Competition. Peter walked away with $25; Henry walked away with $100! Henry won! Henry moves on to the Zone Level competition on March 8, hosted here at Palm Valley. The assigned topic was “Liberty and Justice for All–What Does It Mean to You?” Henry said it’s like having a heavy loaf of bread. Liberty is nutritious and provides sustenance. He opens his speech with the idea that the Founding Fathers built a lightning rod called “Liberty and Justice for all” that protects this nation from the lightning strikes of chaos. Henry could continue to advance through three additional levels: Region, District, and Area–earning potentially over $10,000.
IMG_2614

Filed Under: Arts & Letters Awards, Performances Tagged With: Henry, Henry Huang, Liberty and Justice for All

NOIZE ‘n LETTAS from Gaven: Yes, I’m Chinese, But…

February 12, 2016 by szachik@pvs.org 5 Comments

Big G just dropped his first single, “Yes, I’m Chinese, But . . .” First released here on the thebirdonfire.org!

 

–by Gaven Li

 

Yes, I’m Chinese
But that doesn’t mean anything
I don’t eat dogs or kitties
Orange chicken is not always my favorite

IMG_0502

Yes, I’m Chinese
But we no longer live in rural places
There are 14 million people in my city
Everyone will fall in love with her beauty

IMG_0500

Yes, I’m Chinese
But not every Chinese is Bruce Lee
I don’t know Kung Fu
and never fight in the street

IMG_0503Yes, I’m Chinese
But we ain’t in the 1960s
Everyday after school
I don’t help my dad farming

IMG_0506

Yes, I’m Chinese
But y’all should remember this:
Hong Kong, Macau and Taiwan
They are all parts of our country

IMG_0505

Yes, I’m Chinese
But I can still rap like Jay-Z
I’m a poetic “gangster”
Comin straight outta PRC

 

IMG_0513-2

Filed Under: Culture, Humor, The World Tagged With: Bruce Lee, China, Hip Hop

The “Power” to Change Your Life

February 10, 2016 by szachik@pvs.org 1 Comment

Processed with VSCOcam with t1 preset–by Ashley Zhou

Wednesday night, January 13, was a heartbreaking moment for many people—the
Powerball jackpot winning numbers were released and 1.5 billion
dollars were taken away. . . by someone else.
The US Powerball is run by the Multi-State Lottery Association, and it
was the most valuable lottery in the United States. If no one
wins a jackpot, the prize is accumulated automatically
into the next one until someone brings the bonus home. The week before January 13 was a
craze for purchasing lottery tickets because the bonus money was the
highest ever in history–$1.5 billion.(what??!!!)39006

“Normally, it is not worth it to buy a lottery ticket of any kind.
Your chances of winning . . . Powerball are less than 1 in 220 million.
You’re more likely to get struck by lightning twice in your natural
lifespan than you are to win the Powerball on a particular ticket. If
the jackpot is $40 million, then the expected value of a lottery
ticket (assuming you only care about the jackpot, not the smaller
prizes), is $40 million / 220 million = 18 cents. Since a ticket costs
$2, you are spending far more than you can reasonably expect to get.

However, last week, when the jackpot was 1.3 billion, the expected
value of a ticket was approximately $1.3 billion / 220 million, or
$5.90 — more than the cost of a ticket. So, in theory, it is worth it
to buy a ticket. In practice, of course, it is effectively certain
that you won’t win, but some–myself included–derive entertainment
from imagining that they can win. That’s why I dropped $10 just this
once. Buying 5 tickets increased my chances from 1 in 220,000,000 to
one in 44,000,000, which you should recognize is still very nearly 0.
From a financial standpoint, buying more tickets is more akin to
spending more money than it is to increasing your chances of winning.”

–Statistics and Calculus teacher, Ms. Emily McKee

mmexport1455143779360Even though the chance of winning the jackpot is so small, it’s
very interesting to talk about: How would you spend that huge amount
of money if you had won the jackpot?
“I’d probably donate $10 million or so to Palm Valley and set up a
scholarship. I’d definitely keep working here because I can’t imagine
anything I’d rather do, but I might give my salary to hire a teacher’s
aide just to do the less fun parts of being a teacher–i.e. everything
except teaching kids. I’d also take college classes whenever I wanted
for the fun of learning. There’d be no pressure, since a bad grade
would have absolutely no impact on my life,” says Ms. McKee.

Our loyalest blog reader, Drama teacher Mr. Sarkis, shared his
idea with us:

After paying the taxes,
I would sit down with a pencil and paper and
while crying tears of joy,
take great delight in planning large amounts to give to:

21 nieces and nephews,… 35 grand nieces and nephews,… 2 great-grand nephews,
St. Jude’s Children’s Research Hospital,
Sisters of St Joseph in Rochester, NY,
a merit scholarship endowment fund for Palm Valley School,
a Dance Training and Performance School….free for young people who
love to dance and are willing to work.

I’d give to . . .
the United Nations Relief Organizations.
I would purchase . . .
• a 2-bedroom penthouse overlooking Central Park in NYC
• a 2-bedroom condo on Las Terrenas Beach in the Dominican Republic
(both of which I would share with friends who love adventure and art
and life)
• a state-of-the-art jumbo-size video-screen-tv communication
console
• I would travel the world and be especially generous in handing out
substantial sums of money to good poor people I encountered along the
way.

I would spend 1 year exploring China by car, and pay whatever the cost
for a chauffeur and a guide with the personality and intelligence and
energy of PVS Senior sudent, Henry Huang.

I would hire a personal full-time cook specializing in low cholesterol
high nutrition, exotic gourmet cooking and invite friends and loved
ones to lots of dinners….. and a personal trainer/masseuse skilled
in teaching old people how to do yoga.

I would contribute large sums of money for research to find a sure cure
for drug addiction.

I would treat 10 high-school students who LOVE American History to
a trip to NYC for a dinner and performance of Broadway’s smash hit
HAMILTON…. AND a comprehensive field-trip study of the memorial site
of the World Trade Center disaster.

I would make-come-true the Dream Vacation of Susie Zachik’s choice.

I would make sure that anyone I knew who needed money…. to support a
quest for Enlightened Happiness…… got it.

I would give meaningful presents to people who really meant it when
they hugged me.

I would pay for every person who goes to dinner or to a movie with me.

I would carry 100 dollar bills at all times…. and watch everyday for
random acts of kindness….. and surprise practioners by giving them
one.

I would pay for their gas everytime I saw a mother or father drive
into a station with children in the back seat of an old shabby looking
car.

I would pay someone to write down the rest of my Powerball dreams
because it is late now and I am tired and I want to go to bed.
Indeed, that much money will definitely change one’s life, but how to
use it is totally up to you. Buying a new Lamborghini? Donating some
money to a hospital? Or getting a mansion in Beverly Hills? However, if
you didn’t win the money, you better go back to work or go
study for your tests and quizzes after daydreaming. LOL. –Editor Gaven Li

Filed Under: Culture, Interview Tagged With: Ashley Zhou, Dreams, Money, Mr. Sarkis, Ms. McKee, Powerball

My Style of Flying: Have Headache Will Travel

January 26, 2016 by szachik@pvs.org 5 Comments

   IMG_0578–by Anna Kleckerova

Over the Christmas holiday, I had to go to Czech, my home country, to take exams that I have there. (I am completing two secondary degrees simultaneously–one IMG_0572here, one in the Czech Republic.) It was already very unfortunate for me having to study for two high schools, but it was necessary to have it done. My journey was planned to begin on the 15th of December. I was all packed and went to a nice brunch with Trey. We were sitting in the restaurant with plates full of pancakes, talking and enjoying our last moments before I left when I remembered to check my flight, making sure everything was still planned and on time. To my surprise, it said that my flight was delayed by about five hours! There was no way this could work because I was flying from Palm Springs to Denver where I was supposed to have only a 45-minute layover. So, Trey and I went to the airport early to ask “What’s going on?!” When we arrived, a man working for United confirmed that I will indeed be missing my flight to Denver by exactly five hours. I started freaking out, so he said he would try to find another flight to get me to Czech on time. It was about 12:45 p.m., and the man finally found another flight and said I can fly to San Francisco, but I would have to go now, because the flight takes off in a little less than ten minutes. Not knowing that I would have to run to my gate, I had left my luggage and purse in Trey’s car so he had to run for it. They didn’t even let me put luggage on the belt and told me to run. So I took my purse, said bye To Trey, and ran to my gate. I had to pass all the TSA checkpoints and everyone was yelling at me that I am late. Finally, I arrived to my plane without knowing if my luggage would fly all the way with me. As I finally got to my seat, some woman was sitting there. So, I went to her and asked her nicely if she can move because it is MY seat, but she refused. I didn’t want to make a big deal of it, so I just put myself down in the middle spot.

When I arrived in San Francisco, I only had a little bit of time to get to my gate, so I was running again. Sweaty, tired, and looking terrible, I somehow managed to get to the gate on time and get ready for my other flight to Frankfurt, Germany. It was luck that I fell asleep on the plane. After half an hour of my beauty sleep, they woke me up with an announcement over the intercom that something happened and they needed a doctor. We were already in the air, so I got pretty spooked–although I IMG_0573never found out what happened. Everything eventually calmed down, and after a tiresome journey, I landed in Frankfurt. Glad I was finally in Europe, my relief was quickly erased when I found out that my remaining flight itineraries were left back in the Palm Springs airport. With no idea where to go, I finally found my gate. But with my luck, my terrible journey didn’t end there. The woman working at Lufthansa said that she didn’t see me on the list for my last flight to Czech, and she explained to me that I couldn’t fly anywhere. After an hour of her calling and me being utterly exhausted, she finally got clearance to let me go to the plane and I successfully flew to Prague.

After about a month home and after I finally finished my exams, I was preparing to go back to the States. I left at the crack of dawn. It was cold and snowy outside, and my mom took me to the airport. Me being me, I got my boarding passes and went to a wrong gate, of course. Luckily, I realized my mistake and walked to the IMG_0574correct one, catching my flight back to Frankfurt. Surprisingly, nothing too bad happened on this flight, and from there I landed in Houston where the worst part of my trip was still waiting for me. Everyone was leaving the plane, and I was slowly following the herd of people off. There was a huge line for immigration control. Luckily, I had a four-hour layover, but nothing would prepare me for what was about to come. I finally got in front and went before the immigration officer. He was going through my papers, passport, joking around, . . . and then he stopped, looked at me, and said that they don’t accept copies of an I-20 (document for international students). When I tried to show him an original one with just my name and a signature on it, he said that there is no date, so they couldn’t accept it. I started being very nervous. He told me to wait and sent someone for me. A police officer came for me and took me to a small room. My international student agency told me to call them if something like this happened, but no phones were allowed in the room. I stayed there three hours being questioned about everything, but I had no way to see the time; I was scared I had missed my flight. The officers there were very nervous because the room was filling up with people every minute. People had to start sitting outside, that’s how packed it was. Some of them couldn’t even speak English, which made the officers even more angry. There were also little kids crying, and I felt really bad after ten hours of them flying. I thought, “They will send me back to my home country,” or “I will definitely miss my flight to Palm Springs.” I would be stuck in Texas without anyone. The officer was trying to joke with me about basketball, but I really wasn’t in the mood for it. They finally let me go, and I didn’t miss my flight (surprisingly), but this experience will always stay in my heart. It was the spookiest thing that has ever happened to me.

Happy flying!

 

–Edited by Trey Lucatero

Filed Under: Humor, The World, Travel Tagged With: deportation, flying, I-20, TSA

Henry’s Take on Nukes: Frightening Moments in History

January 22, 2016 by szachik@pvs.org 3 Comments

unnamed-2

The explosion of Czar Bomba as viewed from 100 miles away–Novaya Zemlya; October 30, 1961

–Henry Huang

 

Two weeks ago, North Korea tested a nuclear weapon, alarming the world. Nuclear weapons are some of the most destructive weapons that man has ever built. During the dark times of the Cold War, there were many crazy ideas about nuclear weapons. Here are a few of them.

1) The Czar Bomba was the biggest nuclear weapon designed and produced in history.

2) The Davy Crockett was the smallest nuclear weapon ever produced but was intended as “conventional weaponry” to be used in the battlefield against the USSR.

And, 3) in the 1950’s, NASA had planned on using nuclear explosions to propel rockets through space.

The Czar Bomba
unnamed-3This weapon is the most powerful explosive device ever built by human beings. Designed by the Soviets in 1960, this device had a yield of 50 megaton TNT–3,800 times more powerful than theHiroshima bomb. However, it was not designed in 50 megaton TNT; it was designed actually to be 100 megaton TNT. For a Hydrogen bomb like that, there is no place in the world that the weapon could be tested safely. That was the reason that the final explosion was only 50 megaton. It was not designed to put into real use. The Soviets were threatening Americans by the explosion of the Czar Bomba. It was designed to be a threat. When it was exploded and tested, the fireball could be seen more than 1,000 kilometers away–that’s more than 600 miles or three times the distance to Los Angeles from Rancho Mirage. The hot wind would givehuman beings 170 kilometers away 3rd degree burns. The explosion ranked second among all the explosions in the world.

 (Note: the largest explosion made dinosaurs extent.)

 

The Davy Crockett

This nuclear weapon was designed by Americans in the late 1950’s. The United States deployed this small “battlefield” nuclear weapon in West Germany in case of unnamed-1possible Soviet invasion. 
 The weapon is not a relatively powerful nuke, only yielding 10 tons TNT payload. A Davy Crockett can only cause damage in a 2.5 mile range. However, that is the reason this weapon is crazy. Because this nuke is so small, it must be fired at close range with a handheld cannon. The radiation caused by firing this weapon at close range might harm the very soldiers who fired the weapon. What’s more, the weapon was designed to use in a conventional battlefield. The idea of using a nuclear weapon conventionally is crazy! How could this be common practice on the battlefield?
The United States Army, however, produced more than 2,100 pieces of the Davy Crockett nuclear device. From 1956 to 1971 Americans were producing them. The Davy Crockett retired from the Army in 1971.

Nuclear Explosions & NASA: Operation Orion
unnamedNASA, in the 1950s, worked on a project meant to send astronauts to Mars. This plan to send rockets to Mars sounds like it has nothing to do with nuclear weapons. However, it was one of the craziest ideas regarding the use of nuclear weapons.
 Crazy was using nuclear weapons in the 60’s to remove rocks and mountains for road access and construction. However, this idea is the craziest. Americans were trying to use nuclear weapons as fuel for rockets! NASA was trying to use the enormous force that nuclear weapon explosions could produce to propel rockets. 
 The plan was so outrageous and so dangerous. They couldn’t steer a nuclear-explosion-powered rocket. The power itself is uncontrollable. The plan was to explode nuclear weapons–one by one–to push the rockets to Mars. In fact, NASA cancelled the plan in a short time.

 

Nuclear weaponry is a representation of human creativity. These designs are representative of the crazy things that happened in a crazy era–the Cold War. If history could repeat itself again, I believe that human beings would not create monsters like these!

*To see a simulation of the destruction of these various nuclear weapons, go to NUKEMAP @ nuclearsecrecy.com/nukemap.

Filed Under: Uncategorized

Ben Can Fly

January 21, 2016 by szachik@pvs.org 5 Comments

Ben Ju, member of our senior class, went skydiving during his Christmas break. It was surprising to many people that he is indeed a fan of extreme sports. Palm Valley blog writers Zhenzhou Hu and Jim Wang interviewed Ben about this adventure. The following is the conversation between them. Be sure to play the video of Ben JUMPING out of a plane.

–Editor Amber Zheng

 

Zhenzhou Hu: I heard you went skydiving during this winter break. How was it?

Ben Ju: It was great! I went skydiving with my friends at Skydive Elsinore in Los Angeles.

Jim Wang: Did your parents know you went skydiving?

Ben: I told them after I did it. Otherwise, I would not have been allowed to go skydiving.

Zhenzhou: Was there anything that encouraged you to do this? Skydiving requires tremendous amounts of courage.

Ben: I did not have enough courage to do it before. However, I survived a car accident which happened during this past Winter Break. I realized that I needed to try the things I wanted to do while I could still do them. You know, . . . YOLO (You Only Live Once.) Skydiving is a way to celebrate my life!

 

Attached is the video of Ben readying for his jump, talking about his jump, flying,  jumping out of the plane, landing, and his comments about the jump–all filmed by Skydive Elsinore.

 

 

 

Filed Under: Culture, Interview Tagged With: Falling Ben, Flying Ben, Jumping Ben

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • …
  • 118
  • 119
  • 120
  • 121
  • 122
  • …
  • 130
  • Next Page »

About

We are the Palm Valley Firebirds of Rancho Mirage, California. Join us in our endeavors. Venture through the school year with us, perusing the artwork of our students, community, and staff. Our goal is to share the poems, stories, drawings and photographs, essays and parodies that come out of our school. Welcome aboard!